Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 2005 | Published
Journal Article Open

On the sphere-decoding algorithm II. Generalizations, second-order statistics, and applications to communications

Abstract

In Part 1, we found a closed-form expression for the expected complexity of the sphere-decoding algorithm, both for the infinite and finite lattice. We continue the discussion in this paper by generalizing the results to the complex version of the problem and using the expected complexity expressions to determine situations where sphere decoding is practically feasible. In particular, we consider applications of sphere decoding to detection in multiantenna systems. We show that, for a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), rates, and numbers of antennas, the expected complexity is polynomial, in fact, often roughly cubic. Since many communications systems operate at noise levels for which the expected complexity turns out to be polynomial, this suggests that maximum-likelihood decoding, which was hitherto thought to be computationally intractable, can, in fact, be implemented in real-time-a result with many practical implications. To provide complexity information beyond the mean, we derive a closed-form expression for the variance of the complexity of sphere-decoding algorithm in a finite lattice. Furthermore, we consider the expected complexity of sphere decoding for channels with memory, where the lattice-generating matrix has a special Toeplitz structure. Results indicate that the expected complexity in this case is, too, polynomial over a wide range of SNRs, rates, data blocks, and channel impulse response lengths.

Additional Information

© 2005 IEEE. Reprinted with permission. Manuscript received June 25, 2003; revised September 19, 2004. The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Prof. Zhi Ding. The authors would like to thank R. Gowaikar for useful discussions on simplifying the derivation in Appendix A.

Attached Files

Published - VIKieeetsp05.pdf

Files

VIKieeetsp05.pdf
Files (566.3 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:58a72ad521c41b887232039d4e055a3a
566.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
March 5, 2024