Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 30, 2008 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Facilitation of Stepping with Epidural Stimulation in Spinal Rats: Role of Sensory Input

Abstract

We investigated the role of afferent information during recovery of coordinated rhythmic activity of the hindlimbs in rats with a complete spinal cord section (approximately T8) and unilateral deafferentation (T12–S2) to answer the following questions: (1) Can bilateral stepping be generated with only afferent projections intact on one side? (2) Can the sensory input from the non-deafferented side compensate for the loss of the afferent input from the deafferented side through the crossed connections within the lumbosacral spinal cord? (3) Which afferent projections to the spinal cord from the non-deafferented side predominantly mediate the effect of epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping? Recovery of stepping ability was tested under the facilitating influence of epidural stimulation at the S1 spinal segment, or epidural stimulation plus quipazine, a 5-HT agonist. All chronic spinal rats were able to generate stepping-like patterns on a moving treadmill on the non-deafferented, but not deafferented, side from 3 to 7 weeks after surgery when facilitated by epidural stimulation. Adaptation to the loss of unilateral afferent input was evident at 7 weeks after surgery, when some movements occurred on the deafferented side. Spinal-cord-evoked potentials were observed on both sides, although middle (monosynaptic) and late (long latency) responses were more prominent on the non-deafferented side. The afferent information arising from the non-deafferented side, however, eventually could mediate limited restoration of hindlimb movements on the deafferented side. These data suggest that facilitation of stepping with epidural stimulation is mediated primarily through ipsilateral afferents that project to the locomotor networks.

Additional Information

© 2008 Society for Neuroscience. Received March 11, 2008; revised May 17, 2008; accepted June 9, 2008. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS16333, Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR)–U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation 07-04-91106, RFBR 07-04-00526, and the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation (Spinal Cord Consortium, Springfield, NJ). We thank Sharon Zdunowski for technical assistance and constructive comments, and Maynor Herrera for excellent animal care. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Attached Files

Published - LAVjns08b.pdf

Supplemental Material - LAVjns08bmovie1.wmv

Supplemental Material - LAVjns08bmovie2.wmv

Supplemental Material - LAVjns08bsupp.pdf

Files

LAVjns08b.pdf
Files (3.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:69dec146163e88a2618fc17e04efdc15
1.5 MB Download
md5:2e1ad0896de4aabaeb3f6f13e2434e36
399.4 kB Preview Download
md5:72ce1898f768362c232d8757b93385c9
1.6 MB Download
md5:d6af87a51a0496a365c5f4812e09aa9d
58.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 16, 2023