Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 1, 2009 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

FGF ligands in Drosophila have distinct activities required to support cell migration and differentiation

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling controls a vast array of biological processes including cell differentiation and migration, wound healing and malignancy. In vertebrates, FGF signaling is complex, with over 100 predicted FGF ligand-receptor combinations. Drosophila melanogaster presents a simpler model system in which to study FGF signaling, with only three ligands and two FGF receptors (FGFRs) identified. Here we analyze the specificity of FGFR [Heartless (Htl) and Breathless (Btl)] activation by each of the FGF ligands [Pyramus (Pyr), Thisbe (Ths) and Branchless (Bnl)] in Drosophila. We confirm that both Pyr and Ths can activate Htl, and that only Bnl can activate Btl. To examine the role of each ligand in supporting activation of the Htl FGFR, we utilize genetic approaches that focus on the earliest stages of embryonic development. When pyr and ths are equivalently expressed using the Gal4 system, these ligands support qualitatively different FGFR signaling responses. Both Pyr and Ths function in a non-autonomous fashion to support mesoderm spreading during gastrulation, but Pyr exhibits a longer functional range. pyr and ths single mutants exhibit defects in mesoderm spreading during gastrulation, yet only pyr mutants exhibit severe defects in dorsal mesoderm specification. We demonstrate that the Drosophila FGFs have different activities and that cell migration and differentiation have different ligand requirements. Furthermore, these FGF ligands are not regulated solely by differential expression, but the sequences of these linked genes have evolved to serve different functions. We contend that inherent properties of FGF ligands make them suitable to support specific FGF-dependent processes, and that FGF ligands are not always interchangeable.

Additional Information

© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009. Accepted 30 December 2008. We thank S. Crews, M. Frasch, E. Giniger, M. Krasnow, M. Levine, A. Michelson, the Bloomington Stock Center, and Harvard Exelixis Distribution Center for providing antibodies and fly stocks; Manfred Frasch and the Stathopoulos laboratory members, especially Sarah Payne, for discussions and comments on the manuscript; Leslie Dunipace for conducting the inverse PCR experiments; Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon for advice on the qPCR experiments; and Jagan Srinivasan for help with graphical representations. This work was supported by grants to A.S. from the NIH (R01 GM078542), the Searle Scholars Program, and the March of Dimes (Basil O'Conner Starter Scholar Award, 5-FY06-12). Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months. Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/136/5/739/DC1

Attached Files

Published - KADdev09.pdf

Supplemental Material - KADdev09figS1.pdf

Supplemental Material - KADdev09figS2.pdf

Supplemental Material - KADdev09figS3.pdf

Supplemental Material - KADdev09figS4.pdf

Supplemental Material - KADdev09figS5.pdf

Supplemental Material - KADdev09figS6.pdf

Files

KADdev09.pdf
Files (3.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:c57e4865b0c79d08e06bdc9494e7f789
2.6 MB Preview Download
md5:3376fc8210cb972a381e31889b27af94
146.5 kB Preview Download
md5:5aa55206f7d6941189646b37fbf7d5f1
86.2 kB Preview Download
md5:e1d571c27469cf1f55a4c9b42abf68b0
98.2 kB Preview Download
md5:0d5423f7d48239c3ce940644605ab193
51.1 kB Preview Download
md5:bf44b699fef7ccad52aaf2a940c6084e
178.1 kB Preview Download
md5:2c9a9f9c770a89d78e8eb794db559890
174.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 17, 2023