Gauge symmetry of the N-body problem in the Hamilton–Jacobi approach
- Creators
- Efroimsky, Michael
- Goldreich, Peter
Abstract
In most books the Delaunay and Lagrange equations for the orbital elements are derived by the Hamilton–Jacobi method: one begins with the two-body Hamilton equations in spherical coordinates, performs a canonical transformation to the orbital elements, and obtains the Delaunay system. A standard trick is then used to generalize the approach to the N-body case. We reexamine this step and demonstrate that it contains an implicit condition which restricts the dynamics to a 9(N–1)-dimensional submanifold of the 12(N–1)-dimensional space spanned by the elements and their time derivatives. The tacit condition is equivalent to the constraint that Lagrange imposed "by hand" to remove the excessive freedom, when he was deriving his system of equations by variation of parameters. It is the condition of the orbital elements being osculating, i.e., of the instantaneous ellipse (or hyperbola) being always tangential to the physical velocity. Imposure of any supplementary condition different from the Lagrange constraint (but compatible with the equations of motion) is legitimate and will not alter the physical trajectory or velocity (though will alter the mathematical form of the planetary equations). This freedom of nomination of the supplementary constraint reveals a gauge-type internal symmetry instilled into the equations of celestial mechanics. Existence of this internal symmetry has consequences for the stability of numerical integrators. Another important aspect of this freedom is that any gauge different from that of Lagrange makes the Delaunay system noncanonical. In a more general setting, when the disturbance depends not only upon positions but also upon velocities, there is a "generalized Lagrange gauge" wherein the Delaunay system is symplectic. This special gauge renders orbital elements that are osculating in the phase space. It coincides with the regular Lagrange gauge when the perturbation is velocity independent.
Additional Information
Copyright © 2005 American Institute of Physics. Received 21 June 2003; accepted 20 August 2003. The authors are grateful to Jean Kovalevsky for an e-mail conversation, which he had with one of us (M.E.) and which initiated this work. M.E. would like to acknowledge his numerous stimulating discussions with Marc Murison, William Newman, and Victor Slabinski. Research by M.E. was supported by NASA Grant No. W-19948. Research by P.G. was partially supported by NSF Grant No. AST 00-98301.Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:4c0f947736f28b81da528dfe4eb85e28
|
172.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 3729
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:EFRjmp05
- Created
-
2006-06-30Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-08Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- TAPIR, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)