Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 2023 | public
Journal Article

Incorporating Full Elastodynamic Effects and Dipping Fault Geometries in Community Code Verification Exercises for Simulations of Earthquake Sequences and Aseismic Slip (SEAS)

Abstract

Numerical modeling of earthquake dynamics and derived insight for seismic hazard relies on credible, reproducible model results. The sequences of earthquakes and aseismic slip (SEAS) initiative has set out to facilitate community code comparisons, and verify and advance the next generation of physics-based earthquake models that reproduce all phases of the seismic cycle. With the goal of advancing SEAS models to robustly incorporate physical and geometrical complexities, here we present code comparison results from two new benchmark problems: BP1-FD considers full elastodynamic effects, and BP3-QD considers dipping fault geometries. Seven and eight modeling groups participated in BP1-FD and BP3-QD, respectively, allowing us to explore these physical ingredients across multiple codes and better understand associated numerical considerations. With new comparison metrics, we find that numerical resolution and computational domain size are critical parameters to obtain matching results. Codes for BP1-FD implement different criteria for switching between quasi-static and dynamic solvers, which require tuning to obtain matching results. In BP3-QD, proper remote boundary conditions consistent with specified rigid body translation are required to obtain matching surface displacements. With these numerical and mathematical issues resolved, we obtain excellent quantitative agreements among codes in earthquake interevent times, event moments, and coseismic slip, with reasonable agreements made in peak slip rates and rupture arrival time. We find that including full inertial effects generates events with larger slip rates and rupture speeds compared to the quasi-dynamic counterpart. For BP3-QD, both dip angle and sense of motion (thrust versus normal faulting) alter ground motion on the hanging and foot walls, and influence event patterns, with some sequences exhibiting similar-size characteristic earthquakes, and others exhibiting different-size events. These findings underscore the importance of considering full elastodynamics and nonvertical dip angles in SEAS models, as both influence short- and long-term earthquake behavior and are relevant to seismic hazard.

Additional Information

© 2023 Seismological Society of America. This article benefitted from constructive feedback provided by Pierre Dublanchet, a second anonymous reviewer, and the associate editor at BSSA. Thanks to Michael Barall who developed and maintains the online platform, and to Ruth Harris for mentorship in leading group code verification exercises. Brittany A. Erickson and Junle Jiang were supported through the Southern California Earthquake Center, Grant Number 18099, 19109, 20113, and 21065. The simulations with BICyclE (J. J.) were conducted with the Award Number EAR170014 from the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant Number ACI‐1548562. Junle Jiang was supported in part by the NSF Award Number EAR‐2221569. The simulations with BICyclE (Valère Lambert and Nadia Lapusta) were carried out on the High‐Performance Computing Center cluster of the California Institute of Technology with the grant support from Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC). Sylvian D Barbot was supported in part by the NSF Award Number EAR‐1848192. Valère Lambert was supported by an NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship. L. D. Z. was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Synergy Grant FEAR (ID: 856559). Jean‐Paul Ampuero and Chao Liang were supported by the French National Research Agency through the UCAJEDI Investments in the Future Project Number ANR‐15‐IDEX‐01. Tobias W. Harvey and Alexandre Chen were supported by NSF Award Number EAR‐1916992 and simulations benefited from access to the University of Oregon high performance computing cluster, Talapas. Duo Li, Casper Pranger, Carsten Uphoff, and Alice‐Agnes Gabriel were supported by ERC StG TEAR, Grant Number 852992 and in part by NSF Award Number EAR‐2121666. The simulations with HBI are supported in part by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19J21676 and 19K04031. Meng Li, Casper Pranger, and Ylona van Dinther were supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) Grant Number DEEP.NL.2018.037, Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Grant Number 200021169880, and EU‐MC ITN Grant Number 604713. Ahmed E. Elbanna and Mohamed Abdelmeguid acknowledge support from NSF CAREER Award Number 1753249 and the DOE under Award Number DE‐FE0031685. Prithvi Thakur and Yihe Huang were supported by NSF Award Number EAR‐1943742. Yoshihiro Kaneko was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 21H05206. Martin Almquist was supported by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Dnr. KAW 2016.0498). Yajing Liu was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant Number RGPIN‐2018‐05389. Simulations of Earthquake Sequences and Aseismic Slip (SEAS)‐themed workshops were funded by SCEC Award Numbers 17151, 18102, 19110, 20120, and 21139. SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement NumbersEAR‐0529922 and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Agreement Number 07HQAG0008. This is a SCEC Contribution Number 12627. DATA AND RESOURCES: Our online platform (https://strike.scec.org/cvws/seas/, last accessed December 2022) is being developed and maintained by Michael Barall. The data for local fault and surface properties are stored on the platform. The supplemental material includes complete problem descriptions for BP1‐FD and BP3‐FD, self‐convergence studies of codes used to obtain the reference solutions, and additional figures for BP3‐QD simulations. Author Contributions: Brittany A. Erickson and Junle Jiang designed the benchmark problems and organized the workshops. Brittany A. Erickson analyzed results and led the writing of the article with significant input from Junle Jiang and Valère Lambert; Valère Lambert and Sylvian D. Barbot provided data for convergence tests; remaining authors are listed alphabetically. All authors provided feedback on benchmark design, participated in the benchmark exercises, and helped revise the article. The authors acknowledge that there are no conflicts of interest recorded.

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023