Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 2023 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

H/V Analysis in Juchitán de Zaragoza, Oaxaca, Following the 2017 M 8.2 Tehuantepec, México, Earthquake

Abstract

In September 2017, over 450 lives were lost in Mexico as a result of two unusual, large-magnitude, normal earthquakes. On 7 September, an M 8.2 earthquake occurred offshore of the State of Oaxaca in the Gulf of Tehuantepec, one of the largest extensional earthquakes to have occurred in a subduction zone. Twelve days later on 19 September an M 7.1 damaging earthquake struck near Puebla and Morelos, over 600 km away. Both earthquakes occurred in the downgoing Cocos plate, which is subducting beneath the North American plate. The first large event was followed on 23 September by a shallow M 6.1 extensional earthquake near Juchitán de Zaragoza, Oaxaca. Researchers from Mexico and the United States collaborated to deploy a temporary seismic network to study the aftershocks of the M 8.2 Tehuantepec, Mexico, earthquake, which included a three-week deployment of 51 Magseis Fairfield Z-Land 5-Hz three-component nodal seismometers ("nodes") near Juchitán and a 6-month deployment of 10 Nanometrics Trillium 120PA broadband seismometers with Reftek RT130 dataloggers for 6 months. In this article, we analyze the capabilities of the nodes to calculate the horizontal/vertical (H/V) spectral ratio and relative amplification using both microtremors and earthquakes and validate the results calculated with the nodes using data from broadband stations from this and previous deployments in the area. We create maps showing a correlation of the distribution of the fundamental frequency and relative amplification of the soil and compare them with the geology and the damage caused by the September 2017 earthquakes. There is a lack of public awareness and discrepancies in the construction procedures in the region, and we find that the majority of damaged houses in the area of study followed the location of river beds and tended to be in places with low resonance frequencies despite being in a low amplification zone.

Additional Information

© 2023 Seismological Society of America. Solymar Ayala Cortez was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT). A Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE) internal grant supported Hector Gonzalez‐Huizar. The authors also want to thank the field crews from The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juarez (UACJ), and Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The authors also thank the people of Oaxaca who let us deploy instruments on their property. The help received by Javier Corral Jurado, Governor of Chihuahua, was of great importance for providing security for the crew and instruments during their transportation across the country with the support of the Chihuahua state police and the Mexican federal authorities. Similarly, the authors are thankful for the help they received from UACJ authorities in the management of crossing and providing the vehicles to transport the instruments deployed in Juchitán de Zaragoza Oaxaca, México, with the collaboration of Mexican and United States customs. The Servicio Sismológico Nacional (SSN) data were obtained thanks to station maintenance, data acquisition, and distribution personnel. The Servicio Sismológico Nacional (México) earthquake catalog is possible thanks to its personnel and product of the calculations made by its Analysis and Interpretation of Seismic Data group. The rapid-response seismic network (RAPID) deployment was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant (Number 1764426). DATA AND RESOURCES: This article results from a binational (American and Mexican) project; all the information utilized is publicly available. Most of the seismic data used in this study were collected as part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded RAPID response network using Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) Portable Array Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere (PASSCAL) broadband seismometers and Magseis Fairfield nodes owned by The University of Texas at El Paso. Data can be obtained from the IRIS Data Management Center available at https://www.iris.edu (last accessed August 2020). The remainder of the seismic data was collected by the Servicio Sismológico Nacional (SSN). Data can be obtained from doi: 10.21766/SSNMX/SN/MX and doi: 10.21766/SSNMX/EC/MX (last accessed September 2021). The geological characteristics of Juchitán were obtained from reports created by Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (SEDESOL), available at https://www.oaxaca.gob.mx/proteccioncivil/atlas-de-riesgo/ (last accessed December 2020), and FSF Grupo Ingeniería, available at https://consultaindigenajuchitan.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/estudio-gotecnico-pe-eolica-del-sur.pdf (last accessed December 2020). We used statistical reports of the number of houses damaged in Oaxaca from Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano (SEDATU), and Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres (CENAPRED), via the platform Atlas Nacional de Riesgos at https://es.scribd.com/document/423564674/Atlas-Riesgos-Naturales-Juchitan-Oaxaca (last accessed December 2022). The Geology map of Juchitán was downloaded from Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografia e Informatica (INEGI), available at https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/mapas/ (last accessed December 2020), but modified to suit our interest region. Some maps were created with Generic Mapping Tools version 6.0.0, available at www.soest.hawaii.edu/gmt (last accessed April 2022) (Wessel and Smith, 1998) and QGIS software version 3.12 (https://www.qgis.org/en/site/, last accessed April 2022). All seismogram plots and frequency content plots come from either ObsPy version 1.2.1, available at https://pypi.org/project/obspy/ (last accessed December 2020) (Beyreuther et al., 2010) or Geopsy version 3.2.2 (SESAME, 2004), available at https://www.geopsy.org (last accessed December 2020). This article would not have been possible without the use of all the aforementioned sources and software. Six figures were included as supplemental material to enrich the content and flow of this article. The other relevant data to this article are available at https://www.tromino.it (last accessed April 2022). The authors acknowledge that there are no conflicts of interest recorded.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - bssa-2021141_supplement-figures1.pdf

Supplemental Material - bssa-2021141_supplement-figures2.pdf

Supplemental Material - bssa-2021141_supplement-figures3.pdf

Supplemental Material - bssa-2021141_supplement-figures4.pdf

Supplemental Material - bssa-2021141_supplement-figures5.pdf

Supplemental Material - bssa-2021141_supplement-figures6.pdf

Files

bssa-2021141_supplement-figures1.pdf
Files (20.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:44e6e91e22cd14fbaf27fc41d5c1aef8
4.7 MB Preview Download
md5:4bbd407e48a4899663834ab1a406d915
644.1 kB Preview Download
md5:d72e62bda9e50ccdbdb47bff6a820341
346.9 kB Preview Download
md5:d8aeb9b7b0c19d510d20b57b9df39214
353.4 kB Preview Download
md5:a69aacbcbbcb1920feffed55b09324ac
13.5 MB Preview Download
md5:7a102e3c943d7b75d9f54596fd8320dd
655.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023