Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 16, 2023 | public
Journal Article

Weak upper-mantle base revealed by postseismic deformation of a deep earthquake

Abstract

Mantle viscosity plays a key role in the Earth's internal dynamics and thermal history. Geophysical inferences of the viscosity structure, however, have shown large variability depending on the types of observables used or the assumptions imposed. Here, we study the mantle viscosity structure by using the postseismic deformation following a deep (approximately 560 km) earthquake located near the bottom of the upper mantle. We apply independent component analysis to geodetic time series to successfully detect and extract the postseismic deformation induced by the moment magnitude 8.2, 2018 Fiji earthquake. To search for the viscosity structure that can explain the detected signal, we perform forward viscoelastic relaxation modelling with a range of viscosity structures. We find that our observation requires a relatively thin (approximately 100 km), low-viscosity (10¹⁷ to 10¹⁸ Pa s) layer at the bottom of the mantle transition zone. Such a weak zone could explain the slab flattening and orphaning observed in numerous subduction zones, which are otherwise challenging to explain in the whole mantle convection regime. The low-viscosity layer may result from superplasticity induced by the postspinel transition, weak CaSiO₃ perovskite, high water content or dehydration melting.

Additional Information

© 2023 Springer Nature. We thank M. Gurnis, H. Kanamori and R. Bürgmann for useful discussions. This work was partially support by the National Science Foundation grant NSF EAR 2142152. Contributions. S.P. conceived the study, analysed the data, performed the modelling, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. J.-P.A. supervised the ICA and modelling and participated in the interpretation. Z.Z. participated in the interpretation. A.G. provided the code for the ICA and guided the time series analysis. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Data availability. GNSS data were obtained from the Nevada Geodetic Lab (geodesy.unr.edu). We also provide the detected postseismic signal, for example, displacements and time evolution, as source data for Fig. 1. Source data are provided with this paper. Code availability. The forward modelling code RELAX is available at https://geodynamics.org/cig/software/relax/. The code for the ICA has been made available33 on the Zenodo repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4322548. The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023