Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 2013 | public
Journal Article

The Scientific Measurement System of the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission

Abstract

The Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission to the Moon utilized an integrated scientific measurement system comprised of flight, ground, mission, and data system elements in order to meet the end-to-end performance required to achieve its scientific objectives. Modeling and simulation efforts were carried out early in the mission that influenced and optimized the design, implementation, and testing of these elements. Because the two prime scientific observables, range between the two spacecraft and range rates between each spacecraft and ground stations, can be affected by the performance of any element of the mission, we treated every element as part of an extended science instrument, a science system. All simulations and modeling took into account the design and configuration of each element to compute the expected performance and error budgets. In the process, scientific requirements were converted to engineering specifications that became the primary drivers for development and testing. Extensive simulations demonstrated that the scientific objectives could in most cases be met with significant margin. Errors are grouped into dynamic or kinematic sources and the largest source of non-gravitational error comes from spacecraft thermal radiation. With all error models included, the baseline solution shows that estimation of the lunar gravity field is robust against both dynamic and kinematic errors and a nominal field of degree 300 or better could be achieved according to the scaled Kaula rule for the Moon. The core signature is more sensitive to modeling errors and can be recovered with a small margin.

Additional Information

The GRAIL mission is supported by the NASA Discovery Program under contracts to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The work described in this paper was mostly carried out at Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The authors thank colleagues who have contributed to this work or reviewed it, especially at JPL: Duncan McPherson, Ralph Roncoli, William Folkner, Kevin Barltrop, Charles Dunn, William Klipstein, Randy Dodge, William Bertch, Daniel Klein, Dong Shin, Stefan Esterhausin, Slava Turyshev, Tom Hoffman, Charles Bell, Hoppy Price, Neil Dahya, Joseph Beerer, Glen Havens, Robert Gounley, Ruth Fragoso, Susan Kurtik, Behzad Raofi, and Dolan Highsmith. From Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company (Denver): Stu Spath, Tim Linn, Ryan Olds, Dave Eckart, and Brad Haack, Kevin Johnson, Carey Parish, Chris May, Rob Chambers, Kristian Waldorff, Josh Wood, Piet Kallemeyn, Angus McMechan, Cavan Cuddy, and Steve Odiorne. From the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center: Frank Lemoine and David Rowlands, and from the University of Texas: Byron Tapley and Srinivas Bettadpur.

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023