Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 2022 | Accepted Version + Published
Journal Article Open

Euclid: Covariance of weak lensing pseudo-C_ℓ estimates. Calculation, comparison to simulations, and dependence on survey geometry

Abstract

An accurate covariance matrix is essential for obtaining reliable cosmological results when using a Gaussian likelihood. In this paper we study the covariance of pseudo-C_ℓ estimates of tomographic cosmic shear power spectra. Using two existing publicly available codes in combination, we calculate the full covariance matrix, including mode-coupling contributions arising from both partial sky coverage and non-linear structure growth. For three different sky masks, we compare the theoretical covariance matrix to that estimated from publicly available N-body weak lensing simulations, finding good agreement. We find that as a more extreme sky cut is applied, a corresponding increase in both Gaussian off-diagonal covariance and non-Gaussian super-sample covariance is observed in both theory and simulations, in accordance with expectations. Studying the different contributions to the covariance in detail, we find that the Gaussian covariance dominates along the main diagonal and the closest off-diagonals, but farther away from the main diagonal the super-sample covariance is dominant. Forming mock constraints in parameters that describe matter clustering and dark energy, we find that neglecting non-Gaussian contributions to the covariance can lead to underestimating the true size of confidence regions by up to 70 per cent. The dominant non-Gaussian covariance component is the super-sample covariance, but neglecting the smaller connected non-Gaussian covariance can still lead to the underestimation of uncertainties by 10–20 per cent. A real cosmological analysis will require marginalisation over many nuisance parameters, which will decrease the relative importance of all cosmological contributions to the covariance, so these values should be taken as upper limits on the importance of each component.

Additional Information

© ESO 2022. Article published by EDP Sciences. Received 14 December 2021; Accepted 5 February 2022; Published online 22 April 2022. We thank the internal and external referees and colleagues for helpful feedback, which has improved the manuscript. This work would not have been possible without the contributions to the community from the developers of NaMaster (Alonso et al. 2019; García-García et al. 2019), CosmoLike (Krause & Eifler 2017; Fang et al. 2020) and the simulations of Takahashi et al. (2017). REU acknowledges a studentship from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council. The Euclid Consortium acknowledges the European Space Agency and a number of agencies and institutes that have supported the development of Euclid, in particular the Academy of Finland, the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, the Belgian Science Policy, the Canadian Euclid Consortium, the French Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, the Danish Space Research Institute, the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, the Netherlandse Onderzoekschool Voor Astronomie, the Norwegian Space Agency, the Romanian Space Agency, the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) at the Swiss Space Office (SSO), and the United Kingdom Space Agency. A complete and detailed list is available on the Euclid web site (http://www.euclid-ec.org).

Attached Files

Published - aa42908-21.pdf

Accepted Version - 2112.07341.pdf

Files

aa42908-21.pdf
Files (3.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:dec7728d330c2052609418837094ca39
1.6 MB Preview Download
md5:0ad23ec7ce506d7bb805536bbedd82c1
1.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 24, 2023