Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 2022 | Accepted Version + Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

A Mechanistic Model for Mud Flocculation in Freshwater Rivers

Abstract

The transport and deposition of mud in rivers are key processes in fluvial geomorphology and biogeochemical cycles. Recent work indicates that flocculation might regulate fluvial mud transport by increasing mud settling velocities, but we lack a calibrated mechanistic model for flocculation in freshwater rivers. Here, we developed and calibrated a semi-empirical model for floc diameter and settling velocity in rivers. We compiled a global data set of river suspended sediment concentration-depth profiles and inverted them for in situ settling velocity using the Rouse-Vanoni equation. On average, clay and silt (diameters <39 μm) are flocculated with settling velocity of 1.8 mm s⁻¹ and floc diameter of 130 μm. Among model variables, Kolmogorov microscale has the strongest positive correlation with floc diameter, supporting the idea that turbulent shear limits floc size. Sediment Al/Si (a mineralogy proxy) has the strongest negative correlation with floc diameter and settling velocity, indicating the importance of clay abundance and composition for flocculation. Floc settling velocity increases with greater mud and organic matter concentrations, consistent with flocculation driven by particle collisions and binding by organic matter which is often concentrated in mud. Relative charge density (a salinity proxy) correlates with smaller floc settling velocities, a finding that might reflect the primary particle size distribution and physical hosting of organic matter. The calibrated model explains river floc settling velocity data within a factor of about two. Results highlight that flocculation can impact the fate of mud and particulate organic carbon, holding implications for global biogeochemical cycles.

Additional Information

© 2022. American Geophysical Union. Issue Online: 17 May 2022; Version of Record online: 17 May 2022; Accepted manuscript online: 06 May 2022; Manuscript accepted: 02 April 2022; Manuscript revised: 11 March 2022; Manuscript received: 15 August 2021. JN acknowledges NASA FINESST Grant 80NSSC20K1645. WWF and MPL acknowledge funding by the Discovery Fund and the Resnick Sustainability Institute at Caltech. GKL acknowledges the Caltech Geology Option Postdoc Fellowship. MPL acknowledges funding from the NASA Delta-X project by the Science Mission Directorate's Earth Science Division through the Earth Venture Suborbital-3 Program NNH17ZDA001N-EVS3 and the National Science Foundation Geomorphology and Land-use Dynamics Grant No. 2136991. The authors thank reviewer Scott Wright and four anonymous reviewers for their feedback, which improved the paper. The authors also thank Editor Ton Hoitink and Associate Editor Florent Grasso. Data Availability Statement: The suspended sediment concentration-depth profile, grain size distribution, and geochemical data used in this paper are freely available in the respective original publications. The authors are grateful to J. Bouchez, E. Dingle, and J. Shelley for sharing data used in this paper. Derived data are available online at https://doi.org/10.22002/D1.8962.

Attached Files

Published - 2021JF006392.pdf

Accepted Version - 2021JF006392-acc.pdf

Supplemental Material - 2021jf006392-sup-0001-supporting_information_si-s01.docx

Files

2021JF006392-acc.pdf
Files (8.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:0dfb6a073448a6e941ff276bd3b330db
1.8 MB Download
md5:64a1905501f08c30bbd0fb13e6e88ca3
1.9 MB Preview Download
md5:fee5be1b8b8cff0bd7a97901221e6f43
4.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
October 9, 2023
Modified:
October 24, 2023