Kinetic Analysis on the Role of Bicarbonate in Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction at Immobilized Cobalt Phthalocyanine
Abstract
The mechanism for carbon dioxide reduction (CO₂RR) to carbon monoxide (CO) at immobilized cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) in aqueous electrolytes has been widely debated. In this work, we investigated the mechanism of CO₂RR to CO on CoPc via experimental reaction kinetics coupled with model fitting. Unexpectedly, reactant order dependences and Tafel slopes deviate from commonly expected values and change depending on the testing conditions. For example, (1) the effect of bicarbonate deviates from power law kinetics and transitions from inhibitory to promotional with increasingly reductive potential, and (2) the CO₂ order dependence deviates from unity at more-reductive potentials. We propose a kinetic model, chosen from more than 15 candidate models, that is able to quantitatively fit all of the experimental data. The model invokes (1) catalyst poisoning via bicarbonate electrosorption, (2) mixed control between concerted proton–electron transfer (CPET) and sequential electron transfer-proton transfer (ET-PT), and (3) both water and bicarbonate as kinetically relevant proton donors. The proposed model also predicts that the relative importance of the above factors changes depending on the reaction conditions, highlighting the potential downfalls of broadly applying reaction mechanisms that were inferred from kinetic data collected in a narrow range of testing conditions. This study emphasizes the importance of cohesively using kinetic data collected over a wide range of operating conditions to test and formulate kinetic models of electrocatalytic reactions.
Additional Information
© 2020 American Chemical Society. ACS AuthorChoice Choice via Creative Commons CC-BY. Received 5 December 2019. Published online 6 March 2020. Published in issue 3 April 2020. The authors would like to acknowledge Dengtao Yang, Mark Sullivan, and Yogesh Surendranath for helpful advice and feedback. This work was funded by the Advanced Concepts Committee at MIT Lincoln Laboratory. J.S.Z. gratefully acknowledges Mathworks for a Mathworks fellowship. The authors declare no competing financial interest.Attached Files
Published - acscatal.9b05272.pdf
Supplemental Material - cs9b05272_si_001.pdf
Supplemental Material - cs9b05272_si_002.xlsx
Files
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 114617
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20220505-565261000
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- MathWorks
- Created
-
2022-05-06Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2022-05-06Created from EPrint's last_modified field