Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 3, 2022 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Three-dimensional imaging for the quantification of spatial patterns in microbiota of the intestinal mucosa

Abstract

Improving our understanding of host–microbe relationships in the gut requires the ability to both visualize and quantify the spatial organization of microbial communities in their native orientation with the host tissue. We developed a systematic procedure to quantify the three-dimensional (3D) spatial structure of the native mucosal microbiota in any part of the intestines with taxonomic and high spatial resolution. We performed a 3D biogeographical analysis of the microbiota of mouse cecal crypts at different stages of antibiotic exposure. By tracking eubacteria and four dominant bacterial taxa, we found that the colonization of crypts by native bacteria is a dynamic and spatially organized process. Ciprofloxacin treatment drastically reduced bacterial loads and eliminated Muribaculaceae (or all Bacteroidetes entirely) even 10 d after recovery when overall bacterial loads returned to preantibiotic levels. Our 3D quantitative imaging approach revealed that the bacterial colonization of crypts is organized in a spatial pattern that consists of clusters of adjacent colonized crypts that are surrounded by unoccupied crypts, and that this spatial pattern is resistant to the elimination of Muribaculaceae or of all Bacteroidetes by ciprofloxacin. Our approach also revealed that the composition of cecal crypt communities is diverse and that Lactobacilli were found closer to the lumen than Bacteroidetes, Ruminococcaceae, and Lachnospiraceae, regardless of antibiotic exposure. Finally, we found that crypts communities with similar taxonomic composition were physically closer to each other than communities that were taxonomically different.

Additional Information

© 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY). Edited by Jeffrey Gordon, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; received October 18, 2021; accepted March 7, 2022. Published April 27, 2022. This work was funded, in part, by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface (ID#1016969, to O.M.-P.), a Biology & Biological Engineering divisional fellowship (to O.M.-P.), a seeding grant from Caltech's Center for Environmental Microbial Interactions, Army Research Office Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative Contract W911NF-17-1-0402, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Award HR0011-17-2-0037, an Innovator Award from the Kenneth Rainin Foundation (Grant 2018-1207), and the Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine. We thank Said Bogatyrev for sharing his expertise and advice, and help with the administration of antibiotics to mice, as well as processing fecal samples for quantitative sequencing. We acknowledge technical advice from Nick Flytzanis, Ben Deverman, and Ken Chan. We thank Andres Collazo and Giada Spigolon at the Beckman Institute Biological Imaging Facility for help with imaging. We thank the veterinarians and Office of Laboratory Animal Research staff for their assistance with animal experiments, Elaine Hsiao for providing Akkermansia muciniphila, and Natasha Shelby for contributions to writing and editing this manuscript. O.M.-P. thanks Jeff Hasty and Lev Tsimring of the BioCircuits Institute at University of California San Diego for the generous space and resources provided to complete this manuscript. Data Availability: Raw data have been deposited in CaltechDATA (https://data.caltech.edu/20077) (58). Author contributions: O.M.-P., R.P., J.A.G., and R.F.I. designed research; O.M.-P., R.P., J.A.G., and H.T. performed research; O.M.-P., R.P., J.A.G., and H.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; O.M.-P., R.P., A.L., J.A.G., and H.T. analyzed data; O.M.-P. and R.F.I. wrote the paper; O.M.-P. and R.F.I. conceived the study; and R.F.I. supervised the research. The authors declare no competing interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at http://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas. 2118483119/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - pnas.2118483119.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.2118483119.sapp.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.2118483119.sm01.mp4

Supplemental Material - pnas.2118483119.sm02.mp4

Supplemental Material - pnas.2118483119.sm03.mp4

Supplemental Material - pnas.2118483119.sm04.mp4

Files

pnas.2118483119.pdf
Files (105.8 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:49338a41666dce62cb4230dbc9c503d1
4.5 MB Preview Download
md5:33ed9935ee7d392deef356450048e2a8
13.2 MB Download
md5:d6d8fa8836d27af683166d6e4c30c20e
45.3 MB Download
md5:25fe424fe902e44c644dae06e10ab330
9.1 MB Preview Download
md5:bc7c86529fb29633acafad0ec28ebfe2
16.1 MB Download
md5:53e95ba44efefd19ea7b0d56e72c382a
17.7 MB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
December 22, 2023