Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 12, 2022 | Submitted + Supplemental Material
Report Open

Modeling and mechanical perturbations reveal how spatially regulated anchorage gives rise to spatially distinct mechanics across the mammalian spindle

Abstract

During cell division, the spindle generates force to move chromosomes. In mammals, microtubule bundles called kinetochore-fibers (k-fibers) attach to and segregate chromosomes. To do so, k-fibers must be robustly anchored to the dynamic spindle. We previously developed microneedle manipulation to mechanically challenge k-fiber anchorage, and observed spatially distinct response features revealing the presence of heterogeneous anchorage (Suresh et al. 2020). How anchorage is precisely spatially regulated, and what forces are necessary and sufficient to recapitulate the k-fiber's response to force remain unclear. Here, we develop a coarse-grained k-fiber model and combine with manipulation experiments to infer underlying anchorage using shape analysis. By systematically testing different anchorage schemes, we find that forces solely at k-fiber ends are sufficient to recapitulate unmanipulated k-fiber shapes, but not manipulated ones for which lateral anchorage over a 3 μm length scale near chromosomes is also essential. Such anchorage robustly preserves k-fiber orientation near chromosomes while allowing pivoting around poles. Anchorage over a shorter length scale cannot robustly restrict pivoting near chromosomes, while anchorage throughout the spindle obstructs pivoting at poles. Together, this work reveals how spatially regulated anchorage gives rise to spatially distinct mechanics in the mammalian spindle, which we propose are key for function.

Additional Information

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. We thank Alexey Khodjakov for PtK2 GFP-α-tubulin cells and Timothy Mitchison for FCPT. We are grateful to Nenad Pavin for helpful discussions, and Arthur Molines, Soichi Hirokawa, Miquel Rosas Salvans, Lila Neahring, Caleb Rux, Gabe Salmon, and other members of the Phillips and Dumont Labs for critical feedback on our work. This work was supported by NIH 1R01GM134132, NIH R35GM136420, NSF CAREER 1554139, NSF 1548297 Center for Cellular Construction, NIH 2R35GM118043-06, the John Templeton Foundation 51250 and 60973 (R.P.), the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub (S.D. and R.P.), NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and a UCSF Kozloff Fellowship (P.S.). The authors have declared no competing interest.

Attached Files

Submitted - 2022.04.08.487649v2.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - media-1.avi

Supplemental Material - media-2.avi

Supplemental Material - media-3.pdf

Files

2022.04.08.487649v2.full.pdf
Files (6.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:ab20db7e7392b2bd0d24ef156853cc0c
174.7 kB Download
md5:57def415b5c02f288a3bbb50be1d9971
3.7 MB Preview Download
md5:5fd13e3964eff13ef794b9c23c598f93
2.0 MB Preview Download
md5:73a868e4ad6ad9304900d8bf625c2926
92.0 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
December 13, 2023