Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 15, 2022 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Experimental constraints on truly conjugate alkaline silicate – carbonatite melt pairs

Abstract

Physical separation of immiscible carbonatites from CO₂-bearing alkaline silicate melts is frequently invoked to explain the common presence of carbonatites in alkaline rock suites. We present new isobaric 1.0 GPa crystallization and liquid immiscibility experiments between 1250 and 925 °C on chemically complex CO₂-bearing subvolcanic basanitic, nephelinitic and nepheline-syenitic compositions from the intrusive complex on Brava Island, Cape Verdes. In the experiments, carbonatites exsolve from silicate melt along the basanite–nephelinite melt fractionation pathway throughout an unmixing temperature window from 1100 to 950 °C. Liquid immiscibility is suppressed by 950 °C by the onset of alkali-feldspathoid crystallization, which deflects the residual silicate melt away from the two-liquid field. While evolving along the two-liquid field boundary, silicate melt increases in SiO₂ from 46 to 51 wt% and decreases in CaO / (Na₂O + K₂O) (by weight) from 0.83 to 0.12, reproducing the observed compositional array of alkaline silicate subvolcanic rocks from Brava. The conjugate carbonatite melts are moderately alkaline Ca-carbonatites with 5 to 9 wt% SiO₂ and CaO / (Na₂O + K₂O) that decreases from 5.64 at 1100 °C to 1.60 at 950 °C. These coexisting silicate and carbonatite melt compositions show that previous high-pressure experimental studies have not yielded truly conjugate melt pairs, mainly due to the use of modified starting materials resulting in melt compositions too enriched in alkalis to match the natural alkaline silicate rock record.

Additional Information

© 2022 Elsevier. Received 27 August 2021, Revised 3 February 2022, Accepted 7 March 2022, Available online 31 March 2022, Version of Record 31 March 2022. This study was financed by SNSF grants P2EZP2_162274 and P300P2_177798. Technical support from Dr. Chi Ma during SEM and EPMA analyses is greatly acknowledged. Dr. Mike Baker is thanked for technical support in the high-pressure lab and for numerous insightful discussions. Prof. George Rossman and Prof. Ed Stolper are acknowledged for granting access to their laboratories and for numerous discussions. We acknowledge thoughtful and constructive reviews by Dr. Alexandre Corgne and one anonymous reviewer. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0012821X22001364-mmc1.xlsx

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0012821X22001364-mmc2.pdf

Files

1-s2.0-S0012821X22001364-mmc2.pdf
Files (11.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:4e2b7e2fe2525ac24f589f9bb230035e
11.6 MB Preview Download
md5:4d996d6ae1a9f3690188ccb7d4714da1
70.7 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023