Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 2022 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Field experiments find no evidence that chimpanzee nut cracking can be independently innovated

Abstract

Cumulative culture has been claimed a hallmark of human evolution. Yet, the uniqueness of human culture is heavily debated. The zone of latent solutions hypothesis states that only humans have cultural forms that require form-copying social learning and are culture-dependent. Non-human ape cultural behaviours are considered 'latent solutions', which can be independently (re-)innovated. Others claim that chimpanzees, like humans, have cumulative culture. Here, we use field experiments at Seringbara (Nimba Mountains, Guinea) to test whether chimpanzee nut cracking can be individually (re-)innovated. We provided: (1) palm nuts and stones, (2) palm fruit bunch, (3) cracked palm nuts and (4) Coula nuts and stones. Chimpanzee parties visited (n = 35) and explored (n = 11) the experiments but no nut cracking occurred. In these experiments, chimpanzees did not individually (re-)innovate nut cracking under ecologically valid conditions. Our null results are consistent with the hypothesis that chimpanzee nut cracking is a product of social learning.

Additional Information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022. Received 20 July 2021; Accepted 07 December 2021; Published 24 January 2022. We thank the DGERSIT and the IREB in Guinea for research authorization; research assistants, K. Doré, F. Doré, F. Zogbila, N. Doré, D. Zogbila, Y. Zogbila, C. Samy, N. Gbouomy and M. O'Reilly for help in the field; and R. Lavooij for technical support. We thank R. Wrangham and S. Koski for helpful comments on the manuscript. Research was supported by grants from the Lucie Burgers Foundation for Comparative Behaviour Research (the Netherlands), Gates Cambridge Trust (Cambridge, UK), Homerton College and Newnham College (Cambridge, UK) to K.K. and by MEXT (grant nos. 12002009, 16002001, 20002001, 24000001 and 16H06283) to T.M. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Data availability: The data for this study are included in Supplementary Table 1. Source data are provided with this paper. Author Contributions: K.K. conceived of the study, designed and coordinated the study, collected data, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. H.C. collected data and commented on the manuscript. A.G.S. participated in coordination of the study and commented on the manuscript. K.L. collected data and commented on the manuscript. T.M. participated in design of the study and commented on the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication and agree to be held accountable for the work performed therein. The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review information: Nature Human Behaviour thanks Ammie Kalan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 41562_2021_1272_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplemental Material - 41562_2021_1272_MOESM2_ESM.mp4

Supplemental Material - 41562_2021_1272_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx

Supplemental Material - 41562_2021_1272_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx

Files

41562_2021_1272_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Files (62.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:910b76275a7b796cb4225fd33031ded6
9.2 kB Download
md5:f45526209ed9b357235c04789a7ee6d6
54.0 kB Preview Download
md5:7240d8641e8dde43c6ed56ce6f7ef179
62.6 MB Download
md5:a5add28f04d0f8fdd6e5e224059c5f59
16.9 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023