Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 2022 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

High strain-rate compression behavior of polymeric rod and plate Kelvin lattice structures

Abstract

The compressive high strain-rate behavior of polymeric Kelvin lattice structures with rod-based or plate-based unit cells was investigated through experimental techniques and finite element simulations. Polymeric lattice structures with 5x5x5 unit cell geometries were manufactured on the millimeter scale using vat polymerization additive manufacturing and tested at low (0.001/s) and high (1000/s) strain-rates. High strain-rate experiments were performed and validated for a viscoelastic split-Hopkinson (Kolsky) pressure bar system (SHPB) coupled with high-speed imaging and digital image correlation (DIC). Experimental results at both low and high strain-rates show the formation of a localized deformation band which was more prevalent in low relative density specimens and low strain-rate experiments. Strain-rate effects of lattice specimens strongly correlate with effects of the base polymer material; both bulk polymer and lattice specimen demonstrated strain-rate hardening, strain-rate stiffening, and decreased fracture strain under dynamic loading. Results show mechanical failure properties and energy absorption depended strongly on the relative density of the lattice specimen and exhibited distinct scaling between relative density and geometry type (rod, plate) and loading rate. High relative density plate-lattices demonstrated inferior mechanical properties to rod-lattices; however, there exists a critical relative density for a given mechanical property (17%–28%) below which plate-lattices outperform rod-lattices of similar mass. High strain-rate explicit finite element simulations were performed and showed good agreement with the mechanical failure trends and deformation modes observed in the experiments.

Additional Information

© 2022 Elsevier. Received 16 August 2021, Revised 25 October 2021, Accepted 5 January 2022, Available online 19 January 2022. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of DOE/NNSA, USA Award No. DE-NA0003957. The authors thank Prof. K.T. Faber (Caltech) for access to the Autodesk Ember 3D printer. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0167663622000059-mmc1.docx

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0167663622000059-mmc2.mp4

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0167663622000059-mmc3.mp4

Files

Files (1.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:3877a6ca1dc8f9197c19706268c5610d
12.5 kB Download
md5:40b9543298cf4abea51a4ead94e46ed3
533.7 kB Download
md5:f7db1e5afdbe72cd2918e70f5fb28c65
648.0 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023