Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published January 2022 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Dynamics of the abrupt change in Pacific Plate motion around 50 million years ago

Abstract

A drastic change in plate tectonics and mantle convection occurred around 50 Ma as exemplified by the prominent Hawaiian–Emperor Bend. Both an abrupt Pacific Plate motion change and a change in mantle plume dynamics have been proposed to account for the Hawaiian–Emperor Bend, but debates surround the relative contribution of the two mechanisms. Here we build kinematic plate reconstructions and high-resolution global dynamic models to quantify the amount of Pacific Plate motion change. We find Izanagi Plate subduction, followed by demise of the Izanagi–Pacific Ridge and Izu–Bonin–Mariana subduction initiation alone, is incapable of causing a sudden change in plate motion, challenging the conventional hypothesis on the mechanisms of Pacific Plate motion change. Instead, Palaeocene slab pull from Kronotsky intraoceanic subduction in the northern Pacific exerts a northward pull on the Pacific Plate, while its Eocene demise leads to a sudden 30–35° change in plate motion, accounting for about half of the Hawaiian–Emperor Bend. We suggest the Pacific Plate motion change and hotspot drift due to plume dynamics could have contributed nearly equally to the formation of the Hawaiian–Emperor Bend. Such a scenario is consistent with available constraints from global plate circuits, palaeomagnetic data and geodynamic models.

Additional Information

© 2021 Nature Publishing Group. Received 21 November 2020; Accepted 29 October 2021; Published 23 December 2021. J.H. and M.G. were partially supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) through awards EAR-1645775 and EAR-2009935. J.R. was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. G.S. was partially supported by NSF grants EAR-1646337 and DMS-1723211. Computations were carried out on the NSF-supported Stampede-2 and Frontera supercomputers at the Texas Advanced Computer Center under allocations TG-EAR160027, TG-DPP130002 and FTA-SUB-CalTech. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Data availability: The raw data for the paper have been deposited on Caltech Data (https://doi.org/10.22002/D1.2150), including the digitized alternative plate reconstruction and the predicted plate motion. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files with their sources annotated in the text. Code availability: The plate kinematic tool GPlates and its python version can be accessed at www.gplates.org/. The original version of CitcomS is available at www.geodynamics.org/cig/software/citcoms/. The adaptive nonlinear Stokes solver (Rhea) used to predict plate motion is available upon request. Author Contributions: J.H. and M.G. designed the study. J.H. carried out the numerical experiments. J.R. and G.S. expanded the functionality of the adaptive nonlinear Stokes solver Rhea and provided expertise in scientific computing. R.D.M. helped with plate reconstruction. All authors participated in result interpretation and manuscript preparation. The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review information: Nature Geoscience thanks Claudio Faccenna and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Stefan Lachowycz and Rebecca Neely in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig10_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig11_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig12_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig13_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig5_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig6_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig7_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig8_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_Fig9_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41561_2021_862_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Files

41561_2021_862_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Files (3.8 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:9220f29ede0a622aec7350d62db70b5a
279.4 kB Download
md5:115ab2cad8c59dc037a8061af26c5725
368.6 kB Download
md5:de313d71d7809dbba3d62241ee16c7c8
386.8 kB Download
md5:e45aaa764d753b88cce216d046287b33
583.3 kB Download
md5:0aa8d288c58ecb98486e686d659b88b6
337.5 kB Download
md5:a462e33448aeb851a302112728359030
506.0 kB Preview Download
md5:eef4de254b712a24eb029280d19177cd
535.0 kB Download
md5:b97292463bf2ff1f888a3b748ce7cd38
138.6 kB Download
md5:481d3db741ed72fc9109485b7017ffc5
208.2 kB Download
md5:5bbb0d7f234525a0f406e8969a262652
464.3 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023