Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published December 20, 2021 | Submitted
Report Open

Precise quantification of behavioral individuality from 80 million decisions across 183,000 flies

Abstract

Individual animals behave differently from each other. This variability is a component of personality and arises even when genetics and environment are held constant. Discovering the biological mechanisms underlying behavioral variability depends on efficiently measuring individual behavioral bias, a requirement that is facilitated by automated, high-throughput experiments. We compiled a large data set of individual locomotor behavior measures, acquired from over 183,000 fruit flies walking in Y-shaped mazes. With this data set we first conducted a "computational ethology natural history" study to quantify the distribution of individual behavioral biases with unprecedented precision and examine correlations between behavioral measures with high power. We discovered a slight, but highly significant, left-bias in spontaneous locomotor decision-making. We then used the data to evaluate standing hypotheses about biological mechanisms affecting behavioral variability, specifically: the neuromodulator serotonin and its precursor transporter, heterogametic sex, and temperature. We found a variety of significant effects associated with each of these mechanisms that were behavior-dependent. This indicates that the relationship between biological mechanisms and behavioral variability may be highly context dependent. Going forward, automation of behavioral experiments will likely be essential in teasing out the complex causality of individuality.

Additional Information

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. We thank Ed Soucy, Joel Greenwood, and Brett Graham of Harvard's Neurotechnology Core for their help with instrument engineering. BdB was supported by a Sloan Research Fellowship, a Klingenstein-Simons Fellowship Award, a Smith Family Odyssey Award, a Harvard/MIT Basic Neuroscience Grant, National Science Foundation grant no. IOS-1557913, and NIH/NINDS grant no. 1R01NS121874-01. KSK and ZW were supported by NSF Graduate Research Fellowships #DGE2013170544 and #DGE1144152. JAZ and MAYS were supported by the Harvard Quantitative Biology Initiative. JAZ was supported by The NSF-Simons Center for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Biology at Harvard, award number #1764269. The authors have declared no competing interest.

Attached Files

Submitted - 2021.12.15.472856v1.full.pdf

Files

2021.12.15.472856v1.full.pdf
Files (10.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:cbc0792b2e96d3dc6b27454e5da37031
10.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023