Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 7, 2021 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Fine-regolith production on asteroids controlled by rock porosity

Abstract

Spacecraft missions have observed regolith blankets of unconsolidated subcentimetre particles on stony asteroids. Telescopic data have suggested the presence of regolith blankets also on carbonaceous asteroids, including (101955) Bennu and (162173) Ryugu. However, despite observations of processes that are capable of comminuting boulders into unconsolidated materials, such as meteoroid bombardment and thermal cracking, Bennu and Ryugu lack extensive areas covered in subcentimetre particles. Here we report an inverse correlation between the local abundance of subcentimetre particles and the porosity of rocks on Bennu. We interpret this finding to mean that accumulation of unconsolidated subcentimetre particles is frustrated where the rocks are highly porous, which appears to be most of the surface. The highly porous rocks are compressed rather than fragmented by meteoroid impacts, consistent with laboratory experiments, and thermal cracking proceeds more slowly than in denser rocks. We infer that regolith blankets are uncommon on carbonaceous asteroids, which are the most numerous type of asteroid. By contrast, these terrains should be common on stony asteroids, which have less porous rocks and are the second-most populous group by composition. The higher porosity of carbonaceous asteroid materials may have aided in their compaction and cementation to form breccias, which dominate the carbonaceous chondrite meteorites.

Additional Information

© 2021 Nature Publishing Group. Received 11 March 2021; Accepted 08 July 2021; Published 06 October 2021; Issue Date 07 October 2021. This material is based on work supported by NASA under contract NNM10AA11C issued through the New Frontiers Program. We are grateful to the entire OSIRIS-REx team for making the encounter with Bennu possible, to C. Wolner and F. Murphy for editorial help, and to the OPAL infrastructure of the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur (CRIMSON) for providing computational resources and support. S.C. thanks the University of Arizona for supporting this study. M.D., C.A., J.D.P.D. and M.A.B. acknowledge the French space agency CNES. C.A. and M.D. acknowledge support from ANR "ORIGINS" (ANR-18-CE31-0014). C.A. was supported by the French National Research Agency under the project "Investissements d'Avenir" UCAJEDI ANR-15-IDEX-01. G.P. and J.R.B. were supported by Italian Space Agency grant agreement INAF/ASI number 2017-37-H.0. B.R. acknowledges financial support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). E.C. thanks CSA, NSERC, CFI, MRIF and UWinnipeg for supporting this study. Data availability: Raw through-calibrated OTES52 and OCAMS53 data are available via the Planetary Data System (https://sbn.psi.edu/pds/resource/orex/). The SPC/OLA v34 shape model is available via the Small Body Mapping Tool (http://sbmt.jhuapl.edu/). The IDs of the OTES observations used here and the best-fitting solutions for the thermophysical model are provided in Supplementary Table 1. The boulder size, location and reflectance used to test the robustness of the results are available in refs. 34,46. Source data are provided with this paper. Code availability: The thermophysical analysis reported here uses custom code based on the thermophysical model of ref. 16, available at https://www.oca.eu/images/LAGRANGE/pages_perso/delbo/thermops.tar.gz. The code to compute the geometry of the OTES acquisitions and boresight is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4781752 (ref. 54). The code to compute Γc for the thermophysical analysis is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4763783 (ref. 55). The rock mapping in Extended Data Fig. 3 was performed using the SAOImageDS9 software available at https://sites.google.com/cfa.harvard.edu/saoimageds9. Other codes that support the findings of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4771035 (ref. 56). Author Contributions: S.C. led the project, the interpretation of the results and the manuscript development, and performed the thermophysical simulations and data analysis. M.D. provided the thermophysical software, performed the thermal cracking calculations, and contributed to the interpretation of the results and the development of the manuscript. G.P. developed the pipeline to retrieve OTES detailed survey data and performed rock mapping in PolyCam images. C.A. curated the discussion on meteoroid bombardment and contributed to writing the manuscript. A.J.R. contributed with the code to convert thermal inertia values in fine-regolith particle size and developed the iterative approach to determine the cut-off value of thermal inertia, together with S.C. J.D.P.D. extracted the observation geometry of the spacecraft and Bennu from mission kernels. R.-L.B. proposed important tests of the robustness of the results. E.A., W.F.B. and J.R.B. contributed to the interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. D.N.D., K.N.B., C.A.B. and K.J.W. provided support in the interpretation of spacecraft imagery. J.P.E. and B.R. contributed to the data interpretation during the OSIRIS-REx Thermal Analysis Working Group meetings, and to the design of the observations and data acquisition. M.A.B. and E.C. contributed to the interpretation of the results. D.S.L. made this study possible as the PI of the OSIRIS-REx mission and contributed to the discussion of the results. The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review information: Nature thanks Guy Consolmagno and Seiji Sugita for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig10_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig11_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig12_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig4_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig5_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig6_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig7_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig8_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_Fig9_ESM.webp

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM10_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM3_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM4_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM5_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM6_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM7_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM8_ESM.xls

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3816_MOESM9_ESM.xls

Files

41586_2021_3816_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Files (4.4 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:6ed470ee5e47283eeec1a63af688abf3
28.7 kB Download
md5:2019169d32776c63d2245b7a9f9ef3b5
458.8 kB Download
md5:f584d683d82759868ade8b436697f784
38.9 kB Download
md5:c12fe7f1a285723a5d39adbf9421d1ff
36.9 kB Download
md5:ff7137d64dbeb2127e69d82e65c9d826
87.1 kB Download
md5:2a22da37903f052f74f0726ebeab0aa5
32.4 kB Download
md5:2acd0775ccea76c65c4b12050c097a7e
497.7 kB Download
md5:68c5d4620d292f2f70ca4c20000e9840
67.4 kB Download
md5:bf5dce2db527376602f482aebe2a3542
57.7 kB Download
md5:47fc02a271ffc106a2fc04520011b558
28.7 kB Download
md5:ce3d21039418146c71dd30389b227af5
26.1 kB Download
md5:9f18bb180faa95f4215bf334773e384f
1.2 MB Download
md5:23ced68412a347e78764c2d4cdf5099f
28.0 kB Download
md5:a2d5febee146ca27922feedb9186bf3b
602.5 kB Preview Download
md5:60dc1b96d3282044d93f5259b01c1d8c
27.1 kB Download
md5:583c47e0dfb2d92e750a27d899af5929
99.3 kB Download
md5:acd848235979e148528dce566e30ec8e
421.3 kB Download
md5:1216e5235dd168a881fa3accfe687b67
549.3 kB Download
md5:32b5137a0454de1ed9fd9a0ab6e7313b
134.3 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023