Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 18, 2021 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by a Trinuclear Copper(II) Complex

Abstract

We report a trinuclear copper(II) complex, [(DAM)Cu₃(μ³-O)][Cl]₄ (1, DAM = dodecaaza macrotetracycle), as a homogeneous electrocatalyst for water oxidation to dioxygen in phosphate-buffered solutions at pH 7.0, 8.1, and 11.5. Electrocatalytic water oxidation at pH 7 occurs at an overpotential of 550 mV with a turnover frequency of ∼19 s⁻¹ at 1.5 V vs NHE. Controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) experiments at pH 11.5 over 3 h at 1.2 V and at pH 8.1 for 40 min at 1.37 V vs NHE confirm the evolution of dioxygen with Faradaic efficiencies of 81% and 45%, respectively. Rinse tests conducted after CPE studies provide evidence for the homogeneous nature of the catalysis. The linear dependence of the current density on the catalyst concentration indicates a likely first-order dependence on the Cu precatalyst 1, while kinetic isotope studies (H₂O versus D₂O) point to involvement of a proton in or preceding the rate-determining step. Rotating ring-disk electrode measurements at pH 8.1 and 11.2 show no evidence of H₂O₂ formation and support selectivity to form dioxygen. Freeze-quench electron paramagnetic resonance studies during electrolysis provide evidence for the formation of a molecular copper intermediate. Experimental and computational studies support a key role of the phosphate as an acceptor base. Moreover, density functional theory calculations highlight the importance of second-sphere interactions and the role of the nitrogen-based ligands to facilitate proton transfer processes.

Additional Information

© 2021 American Chemical Society. Received: March 26, 2021; Revised: May 15, 2021; Published: June 4, 2021. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (CBET-1805022) and the MAXNET Energy effort. EPR experiments were supported by the Max Planck Society, and the EPR instrument was funded by the Helmholtz Energy Materials Foundry (HEMF). The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - cs1c01395_si_001.pdf

Supplemental Material - cs1c01395_si_002.cif

Files

cs1c01395_si_001.pdf
Files (4.9 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:f916ba01e7653d5816a98413bb87f9d7
3.2 MB Preview Download
md5:29808c8c2976ec630de9a9cafde6ed53
1.7 MB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023