Signed and unsigned reward prediction errors dynamically enhance learning and memory
- Creators
- Rouhani, Nina
- Niv, Yael
Abstract
Memory helps guide behavior, but which experiences from the past are prioritized? Classic models of learning posit that events associated with unpredictable outcomes as well as, paradoxically, predictable outcomes, deploy more attention and learning for those events. Here, we test reinforcement learning and subsequent memory for those events, and treat signed and unsigned reward prediction errors (RPEs), experienced at the reward-predictive cue or reward outcome, as drivers of these two seemingly contradictory signals. By fitting reinforcement learning models to behavior, we find that both RPEs contribute to learning by modulating a dynamically changing learning rate. We further characterize the effects of these RPE signals on memory and show that both signed and unsigned RPEs enhance memory, in line with midbrain dopamine and locus-coeruleus modulation of hippocampal plasticity, thereby reconciling separate findings in the literature.
Additional Information
© 2021 Rouhani and Niv. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. Received: 14 July 2020; Accepted: 26 February 2021; Published: 04 March 2021. We thank Angela Radulescu and Isabel Berwian for helpful comments. This work was supported by grant W911NF-14-1-0101 from the Army Research Office (YN), grant R01MH098861 from the National Institute for Mental Health (YN), grant R21MH120798 from the National Institute of Health (YN) and the National Science Foundation's Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. Data availability: All data files and code for models, analysis and figures are publicly available at https://github.com/ninarouhani/2021_RouhaniNiv copy archived at https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:fa15d035dc4033ebad03f48dbd5c75b0c4d76c40/. Author contributions: Nina Rouhani, Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing; Yael Niv, Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing. Ethics: Human subjects: We obtained informed consent online; procedures were approved by Princeton University's Institutional Review Board (IRB #4452).Attached Files
Published - elife-61077-v2.pdf
Supplemental Material - elife-61077-transrepform-v2.docx
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:616552f71c7a2fa64452204b0e605c8d
|
251.9 kB | Download |
md5:449e08cbddceb71fefca9a2453ac0734
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC8041467
- Eprint ID
- 108867
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20210429-105343327
- W911NF-14-1-0101
- Army Research Office (ARO)
- R01MH098861
- NIH
- R21MH120798
- NIH
- NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
- Created
-
2021-04-29Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-04-29Created from EPrint's last_modified field