Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 1, 2021 | Accepted Version + Published
Journal Article Open

Injection of Inner Oort Cloud Objects into the Distant Kuiper Belt by Planet Nine

Abstract

The outer solar system exhibits an anomalous pattern of orbital clustering, characterized by an approximate alignment of the apsidal lines and angular momentum vectors of distant, long-term stable Kuiper Belt objects. One explanation for this dynamical confinement is the existence of a yet-undetected planetary-mass object, "Planet Nine (P9)." Previous work has shown that trans-Neptunian objects, that originate within the scattered disk population of the Kuiper Belt, can be corralled into orbital alignment by Planet Nine's gravity over ~Gyr timescales, and characteristic P9 parameters have been derived by matching the properties of a synthetic Kuiper Belt generated within numerical simulations to the available observational data. In this work, we show that an additional dynamical process is in play within the framework of the Planet Nine hypothesis, and demonstrate that P9-induced dynamical evolution facilitates orbital variations within the otherwise dynamically frozen inner Oort cloud. As a result of this evolution, inner Oort cloud bodies can acquire orbits characteristic of the distant scattered disk, implying that if Planet Nine exists, the observed census of long-period trans-Neptunian objects is comprised of a mixture of Oort cloud and Kuiper Belt objects. Our simulations further show that although inward-injected inner Oort cloud objects exhibit P9-driven orbital confinement, the degree of clustering is weaker than that of objects originating within the Kuiper Belt. Cumulatively, our results suggest that a more eccentric Planet Nine is likely necessary to explain the data than previously thought.

Additional Information

© 2021. The American Astronomical Society. Received 2020 December 30; revised 2021 February 24; accepted 2021 March 11; published 2021 April 6. We are thankful to Alessandro Morbidelli, Darryl Seligman, Juliette Becker, Fred Adams, David Nesvorný, and Eduardo Marturet for insightful discussions. We are additionally grateful to David Nesvorný for sharing his implementation of Galactic tide accelerations. We thank the anonymous referee for providing a thorough and insightful report. K.B. is grateful to Caltech, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for their generous support.

Attached Files

Published - Batygin_2021_ApJL_910_L20.pdf

Accepted Version - 2104.05799.pdf

Files

Batygin_2021_ApJL_910_L20.pdf
Files (10.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:99f44814e6a5a99dd38e56a3e98c1a91
1.2 MB Preview Download
md5:fd8107d16b4e73f4d4d98da53cb4c37c
9.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023