Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 26, 2021 | Supplemental Material + Submitted + Published
Journal Article Open

Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling

Abstract

Simple choices (e.g., eating an apple vs. an orange) are made by integrating noisy evidence that is sampled over time and influenced by visual attention; as a result, fluctuations in visual attention can affect choices. But what determines what is fixated and when? To address this question, we model the decision process for simple choice as an information sampling problem, and approximate the optimal sampling policy. We find that it is optimal to sample from options whose value estimates are both high and uncertain. Furthermore, the optimal policy provides a reasonable account of fixations and choices in binary and trinary simple choice, as well as the differences between the two cases. Overall, the results show that the fixation process during simple choice is influenced dynamically by the value estimates computed during the decision process, in a manner consistent with optimal information sampling.

Additional Information

© 2021 Callaway et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received: August 30, 2020; Accepted: March 10, 2021; Published: March 26, 2021. We thank Ian Krajbich for his help in simulating the aDDM and Bas van Opheusden for suggesting the method for efficiently computing VOI_(full). Funding: This research was supported by a grant from Facebook Reality Labs awarded to TG (https://research.fb.com/category/augmentedreality- virtual-reality/) and a grant from the NOMIS Foundation (https://nomisfoundation.ch/) awarded to AR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Author Contributions: Conceptualization: Frederick Callaway, Antonio Rangel, Thomas L. Griffiths. Data curation: Antonio Rangel. Formal analysis: Frederick Callaway. Funding acquisition: Thomas L. Griffiths. Software: Frederick Callaway. Supervision: Antonio Rangel, Thomas L. Griffiths. Visualization: Frederick Callaway. Writing – original draft: Frederick Callaway, Antonio Rangel. Writing – review & editing: Frederick Callaway, Antonio Rangel, Thomas L. Griffiths.

Attached Files

Published - journal.pcbi.1008863.pdf

Submitted - callaway-fixation-patterns.pdf

Supplemental Material - journal.pcbi.1008863.s001.pdf

Supplemental Material - journal.pcbi.1008863.s002.pdf

Files

journal.pcbi.1008863.s002.pdf
Files (35.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:d9506db64deba2b5b82011d7680a40f8
26.8 MB Preview Download
md5:1a9cfb69a2cdd94cbdd0226258ff4dca
1.5 MB Preview Download
md5:b5d3c640a80165f85a383685bba28bc1
4.6 MB Preview Download
md5:7b7c05750ee722ab24cc02a113782bfc
2.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023