Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2021 | Accepted Version
Journal Article Open

Everyday Executive Function and Self-Awareness in Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum

Abstract

Objective: Agenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC) is associated with a range of cognitive deficits, including mild to moderate problems in higher order executive functions evident in neuropsychological assessments. Previous research has also suggested a lack of self-awareness in persons with AgCC. Method: We investigated daily executive functioning and self-awareness in 36 individuals with AgCC by analyzing self-ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A), as well as ratings on the same instrument from close relatives. Discrepancies between self- and informant-ratings were compared to the normative sample and exploratory analyses examined possible moderating effects of participant and informant characteristics. Results: Significant deficiencies were found in the Behavioral Regulation and Metacognitive indices for both the self and informant results, with elevated frequency of metacognition scores in the borderline to clinical range. Informants also endorsed elevated frequency of borderline to clinically significant behavioral regulation scores. The proportion of AgCC participants whose self-ratings indicated less metacognitive impairment than informant-ratings was greater than in the normative sample. Self-ratings of behavioral regulation impairment decreased with age and informant-ratings of metacognition were higher in males than females. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that individuals with AgCC experience mild to moderate executive functioning problems in everyday behavior which are observed by others. Results also suggest a lack of self-understanding or insight into the severity of these problems in the individuals with AgCC, particularly with respect to their metacognitive functioning.

Additional Information

© 2021 INS. Published by Cambridge University Press. Received August 3, 2020; Final revision December 8, 2020; Accepted January 4, 2021. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 March 2021. Data included in this paper was also utilized in the doctoral dissertations of RM & JM, at the Fuller Graduate School of Psychology. This research was not supported by extramural funding. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - nihms-1768842.pdf

Files

nihms-1768842.pdf
Files (365.9 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:ec04ea926890a30fd8b089435616d35e
365.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023