Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 11, 2021 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Propagation of large earthquakes as self-healing pulses or mild cracks

Abstract

Observations suggest that mature faults host large earthquakes at much lower levels of stress than their expected static strength. Potential explanations are that the faults are quasi-statically strong but experience considerable weakening during earthquakes, or that the faults are persistently weak, for example, because of fluid overpressure. Here we use numerical modelling to examine these competing theories for simulated earthquake ruptures that satisfy the well known observations of 1–10 megapascal stress drops and limited heat production. In that regime, quasi-statically strong but dynamically weak faults mainly host relatively sharp, self-healing pulse-like ruptures, with only a small portion of the fault slipping at a given time, whereas persistently weak faults host milder ruptures with more spread-out slip, which are called crack-like ruptures. We find that the sharper self-healing pulses, which exhibit larger dynamic stress changes compared to their static stress changes, result in much larger radiated energy than that inferred teleseismically for megathrust events. By contrast, milder crack-like ruptures on persistently weak faults, which produce comparable static and dynamic stress changes, are consistent with the seismological observations. The larger radiated energy of self-healing pulses is similar to the limited regional inferences available for crustal strike-slip faults. Our findings suggest that either large earthquakes rarely propagate as self-healing pulses, with potential differences between tectonic settings, or their radiated energy is substantially underestimated, raising questions about earthquake physics and the expected shaking from large earthquakes.

Additional Information

© 2021 Nature Publishing Group. Received 08 November 2019; Accepted 18 January 2021; Published 10 March 2021. This study was supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) (grants EAR 1142183 and 1520907), the US Geological Survey (grant G19AP00059) and the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), contribution no. 10085. SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR 1033462 and US Geological Survey Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. Numerical simulations for this study were carried out on the High Performance Computing Center cluster of the California Institute of Technology. We thank H. Kanamori, T. Heaton, J.-P. Avouac, V. Tsai and Z. Zhan for discussions and comments. Data availability: Numerical data are accessible through the CaltechDATA repository (https://data.caltech.edu/records/1620). Seismological inferences used in this study are compiled from published literature and publicly available sources. Source data are provided with this paper. Code availability: The numerical methodology used in this study is described in the Supplementary Materials and references32,49. Author Contributions: V.L and N.L contributed to developing the main ideas, interpreting the results and producing the manuscript. S.P. performed preliminary simulations comparing crack-like ruptures and self-healing pulses. V.L. designed, carried out and analysed the numerical experiments described in the paper. The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review information: Nature thanks Jeffrey J. McGuire, Peter Shearer and Alice-Agnes Gabriel for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM2_ESM.mp4

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM3_ESM.mp4

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM4_ESM.mp4

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx

Supplemental Material - 41586_2021_3248_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx

Files

41586_2021_3248_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Files (32.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:f10b3ee92cdf6880b8bc81ea9dc867ae
31.1 MB Preview Download
md5:e91786773349b393b33d5b4df449a71c
67.1 kB Download
md5:0b6e8297478bd13a5986b1e4d65d1fde
54.7 kB Download
md5:c8c98a2b212aa30ce2e8080257824b31
45.1 kB Download
md5:90419b33a8db36101f91988398480a36
634.9 kB Download
md5:153db273e141dd38adac2bb01d0b9c91
209.7 kB Download
md5:5236754e4d129f6c9bc2dc07495aaa11
662.1 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023