Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) provides novel and powerful ways of accurately and efficiently recognizing complex patterns, emulating nonlinear dynamics, and predicting the spatio-temporal evolution of weather and climate processes. Off-the-shelf ML models, however, do not necessarily obey the fundamental governing laws of physical systems, nor do they generalize well to scenarios on which they have not been trained. We survey systematic approaches to incorporating physics and domain knowledge into ML models and distill these approaches into broad categories. Through 10 case studies, we show how these approaches have been used successfully for emulating, downscaling, and forecasting weather and climate processes. The accomplishments of these studies include greater physical consistency, reduced training time, improved data efficiency, and better generalization. Finally, we synthesize the lessons learned and identify scientific, diagnostic, computational, and resource challenges for developing truly robust and reliable physics-informed ML models for weather and climate processes.
Additional Information
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society. Manuscript accepted 24/11/2020; Published online 15/02/2021; Published in print 05/04/2021. This article is part of the theme issue 'Machine learning for weather and climate modelling'. Data accessibility: Data, code and supporting materials are publicly available via the following links: https://github.com/jinlong83/statistical-constrained-GANS; https://github.com/maxjiang93/space_time_pde; https://github.com/Rose-STL-Lab/Turbulent-Flow-Net; https://github.com/Rui1521/Equivariant-Neural-Nets; https://github.com/ashesh6810/Deep-Spatial-Transformers; https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/?option=com_csw&view=details&product_id=GLOBAL_ANALYSIS_FORECAST_PHY_001_024; https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?packageid=edi.200.6; https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/8f19c5d19d816857e55077ba20570265; https://prism.oregonstate.edu/; https://github.com/arkadaw9/PGA_LSTM; https://lter.limnology.wisc.edu/data; https://gitlab.com/mspritch/spcam3.0-neural-net; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2559313. Authors' contributions: K.K. conceived the idea and designed the structure of the manuscript, wrote the manuscript, and responded to reviewer comments. K.K., M.M., and A.A. led the majority of the research reviewed as case studies in this article. The rest of the authors contributed to the research reviewed as case studies or provided feedback on sections of the manuscript. K.K. dedicates this work to A.A., a colleague and dear friend, who unfortunately was killed in a hit-and-run road accident while he was biking, during the course of preparation of this manuscript. We declare we have no competing interests. No funding has been received for this article.Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 108161
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20210223-154127043
- Created
-
2021-02-23Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2023-06-01Created from EPrint's last_modified field