Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 28, 2021 | Accepted Version + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Synthesis, structural studies, and redox chemistry of bimetallic [Mn(CO)₃] and [Re(CO)₃] complexes

Abstract

Manganese ([Mn(CO)₃]) and rhenium tricarbonyl ([Re(CO)₃]) complexes represent a workhorse family of compounds with applications in a variety of fields. Here, the coordination, structural, and electrochemical properties of a family of mono- and bimetallic [Mn(CO)₃] and [Re(CO)₃] complexes are explored. In particular, a novel heterobimetallic complex featuring both [Mn(CO)₃] and [Re(CO)₃] units supported by 2,2′-bipyrimidine (bpm) has been synthesized, structurally characterized, and compared to the analogous monomeric and homobimetallic complexes. To enable a comprehensive structural analysis for the series of complexes, we have carried out new single crystal X-ray diffraction studies of seven compounds: Re(CO)₃Cl(bpm), anti-[{Re(CO₃)Cl}₂(bpm)], Mn(CO)₃Br(bpz) (bpz = 2,2′-bipyrazine), Mn(CO)₃Br(bpm), syn- and anti-[{Mn(CO3)Br}₂(bpm)], and syn-[Mn(CO₃)Br(bpm)Re(CO)₃Br]. Electrochemical studies reveal that the bimetallic complexes are reduced at much more positive potentials (ΔE ≥ 380 mV) compared to their monometallic analogues. This redox behavior is consistent with introduction of the second tricarbonyl unit which inductively withdraws electron density from the bridging, redox-active bpm ligand, resulting in more positive reduction potentials. [Re(CO₃)Cl]₂(bpm) was reduced with cobaltocene; the electron paramagnetic resonance spectrum of the product exhibits an isotropic signal (near g = 2) characteristic of a ligand-centered bpm radical. Our findings highlight the facile synthesis as well as the structural characteristics and unique electrochemical behavior of this family of complexes.

Additional Information

© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021. Submitted 22 Oct 2020; Accepted 11 Jan 2021; First published 12 Jan 2021. The authors thank Dr Justin Douglas and Sarah Neuenswander for assistance with NMR and EPR spectroscopy. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through awards OIA-1833087 and CHE-1305124. W. C. H. was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health Graduate Training Program in the Dynamic Aspects of Chemical Biology (T32 GM008545-25). The authors also acknowledge the U.S. National Science Foundation and U.S. National Institutes of Health for support of the EPR instrumentation (CHE-0946883) and NMR instrumentation (S10OD016360, S10RR024664, and CHE-0320648) used in this study. The Bruker D8 Kappa X-ray diffractometer used for 1 was purchased via an NSF CRIF:MU award to the California Institute of Technology (CHE-0639094). A Dow Next Generation Instrumentation Grant supported the crystallographic studies on 2-anti, 3, 4, 5-syn, 5-anti, and 6-syn. There are no conflicts to declare.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - nihms-1672121.pdf

Supplemental Material - d0dt03666h1.xyz

Supplemental Material - d0dt03666h2.pdf

Supplemental Material - d0dt03666h3.cif

Files

d0dt03666h2.pdf
Files (6.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:e8b116423b656767a4a3a39bac0eb42a
4.7 MB Preview Download
md5:e36083a836b07d80dc4723ea229689a3
10.7 kB Download
md5:2d1bbdc8c71e25116cd1340495bff678
134.8 kB Download
md5:ad16122fefa7e511bb4376fcba083a85
1.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023