Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published December 2, 2020 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Significant wintertime PM_(2.5) mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta, China, from 2016 to 2019: observational constraints on anthropogenic emission controls

Abstract

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM_(2.5)) mitigation relies strongly on anthropogenic emission control measures, the actual effectiveness of which is challenging to pinpoint owing to the complex synergies between anthropogenic emissions and meteorology. Here, observational constraints on model simulations allow us to derive not only reliable PM_(2.5) evolution but also accurate meteorological fields. On this basis, we isolate meteorological factors to achieve reliable estimates of surface PM_(2.5) responses to both long-term and emergency emission control measures from 2016 to 2019 over the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China. The results show that long-term emission control strategies play a crucial role in curbing PM_(2.5) levels, especially in the megacities and other areas with abundant anthropogenic emissions. The G20 summit hosted in Hangzhou in 2016 provides a unique and ideal opportunity involving the most stringent, even unsustainable, emergency emission control measures. These emergency measures lead to the largest decrease (∼ 35 µg m⁻³, ∼ 59 %) in PM_(2.5) concentrations in Hangzhou. The hotspots also emerge in megacities, especially in Shanghai (32 µg m⁻³, 51 %), Nanjing (27 µg m⁻³, 55 %), and Hefei (24 µg m⁻³, 44 %) because of the emergency measures. Compared to the long-term policies from 2016 to 2019, the emergency emission control measures implemented during the G20 Summit achieve more significant decreases in PM_(2.5) concentrations (17 µg m⁻³ and 41 %) over most of the whole domain, especially in Hangzhou (24 µg m⁻³, 48 %) and Shanghai (21 µg m⁻³, 45 %). By extrapolation, we derive insight into the magnitude and spatial distribution of PM_(2.5) mitigation potential across the YRD, revealing significantly additional room for curbing PM_(2.5) levels.

Additional Information

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Received: 27 May 2020 – Discussion started: 22 July 2020. - Revised: 18 September 2020 – Accepted: 9 October 2020 – Published: 2 December 2020. This study was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of China (nos. 2016YFC0202702, 2018YFC0213506, and 2018YFC0213503), National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control in China (no. DQGG0107) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 21577126 and 41561144004). Pengfei Li is supported by Initiation Fund for Introducing Talents of Hebei Agricultural University (412201904) and Hebei Youth Top Fund (BJ2020032). This research has been supported by the Department of Science and Technology of China (grant nos. 2016YFC0202702, 2018YFC0213506, and 2018YFC0213503), National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control in China (grant no. DQGG0107), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21577126, 41561144004, and 22006030), Initiation Fund for Introducing Talents of Hebei Agricultural University (grant no. 412201904), and Hebei Youth Top Fund (grant no. BJ2020032). Data availability. Ground-based PM_(2.5) measurement data and meteorology measurements are obtained from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (http://106.37.208.233:20035/, last access: 1 December 2020) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC; https://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/CDO/cdoselect.cmd, last access: 1 December 2020), respectively. Supplement. The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14787-2020-supplement. Author contributions. SY and PL designed this study. SY, PL, LW, XC, and JHS carried out analyses, interpreted data, and wrote the article. ZL, YiZ, ML, KM, WL, TC, YaZ, and DR contributed to the discussions. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Review statement. This paper was edited by Pedro Jimenez-Guerrero and reviewed by Yuzhong Zhang and one anonymous referee.

Attached Files

Published - acp-20-14787-2020.pdf

Supplemental Material - acp-20-14787-2020-supplement.pdf

Files

acp-20-14787-2020.pdf
Files (15.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:908ca73d0c47504db41cc7abdf4edfc6
11.6 MB Preview Download
md5:c3ded02cc0256aedc31f0dc96b7edcbc
3.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023