Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 8, 2003 | public
Journal Article

A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis

Abstract

The confidence limit is a standard measure of the accuracy of the result in any statistical analysis. Most of the confidence limits are derived as follows. The data are first divided into subsections and then, under the ergodic assumption, the temporal mean is substituted for the ensemble mean. Next, the confidence limit is defined as a range of standard deviations from this mean. However, such a confidence limit is valid only for linear and stationary processes. Furthermore, in order for the ergodic assumption to be valid, the subsections have to be statistically independent. For non‐stationary and nonlinear processes, such an analysis is no longer valid. The confidence limit of the method here termed EMD/HSA (for empirical mode decomposition/Hilbert spectral analysis) is introduced by using various adjustable stopping criteria in the sifting processes of the EMD step to generate a sample set of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). The EMD technique acts as a pre‐processor for HSA on the original data, producing a set of components (IMFs) from the original data that equal the original data when added back together. Each IMF represents a scale in the data, from smallest to largest. The ensemble mean and standard deviation of the IMF sample sets obtained with different stopping criteria are calculated, and these form a simple random sample set. The confidence limit for EMD/HSA is then defined as a range of standard deviations from the ensemble mean. Without evoking the ergodic assumption, subdivision of the data stream into short sections is unnecessary; hence, the results and the confidence limit retain the full‐frequency resolution of the full dataset. This new confidence limit can be applied to the analysis of nonlinear and non‐stationary processes by these new techniques. Data from length‐of‐day measurements and a particularly violent recent earthquake are used to demonstrate how the confidence limit is obtained and applied. By providing a confidence limit for this new approach, a stable range of stopping criteria for the decomposition or sifting phase (EMD) has been established, making the results of the final processing with HSA, and the entire EMD/HSA method, more definitive.

Additional Information

© 2003 The Royal Society. Received 4 September 2001; accepted 14 January 2003; published online 23 July 2003. This research is performed under the support by the NASA RTOP Program through the Oceanic Processes Program Office. N.E.H. and S.R.L. express their sincere appreciation for the consistent support from Dr E. Lindstrom of NASA Headquarters. N.E.H. is also supported in part by an ONR Grant (no. N00014-98-F-0412) from the Processes and Prediction Program, and in part by a NOAA grant. S.S.P.S. is supported by a Senior NRC Fellowship at the Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, while on leave from the University of Alberta, and in part by a NOAA grant. W.Q. is supported in part through a grant to California Institute of Technology from NASA. K.L.F. expresses thanks for support by a grant from the National Research Council, Taiwan, ROC. We would like to also thank Dr Ben Chao for his many encouragements, and Dr Richard Gross for generously providing the LOD data, without which the present study would not be possible. Additional thanks go to Abigail Long for editorial help in the final preparations of the manuscript.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023