Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2020 | Published
Journal Article Open

The Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) Captures the Ecohydrologic Sensitivity of a Semiarid Mixed Conifer Forest

Abstract

At the seasonal time scale, daily photochemical reflectance index (PRI) measurements track changes in photoprotective pigment pools as plants respond to seasonally variable environmental conditions. As such, remotely sensed PRI products present opportunities to study seasonal processes in evergreen conifer forests, where complex vegetation dynamics are difficult to capture due to small annual changes in chlorophyll content or leaf structure. Because PRI is tied explicitly to short‐ and long‐term changes in photoprotective pigments that are responsible for regulating stress, we hypothesize that PRI by extension could serve as a proxy for stomatal response to seasonally changing hydroclimate, assuming plant functional responses to stress covary in space and time. To test this, we characterized PRI in a semiarid, montane mixed conifer forest in the Madrean sky islands of Arizona, USA, during the monsoon growing season subject to precipitation pulse dynamics. To determine the sensitivity of PRI to ecohydrologic variability and associated changes in gross primary productivity (GPP), canopy spectral measurements were coupled with eddy covariance CO₂ flux and sap flow measurements. Seasonally, there was a significant relationship between PRI and sap flow velocity (R² = 0.56), and multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated a PRI response to dynamic water and energy limitations in this system. We conclude that PRI has potential to serve as a proxy for forest functional response to seasonal ecohydrologic forcing. The coordination between photoprotective pigments and seasonal stomatal regulation demonstrated here could aid characterization of vegetation response to future changes in hydroclimate at increasing spatial scales.

Additional Information

© 2020 American Geophysical Union. Issue Online: 23 November 2020; Version of Record online: 23 November 2020; Accepted manuscript online: 27 October 2020; Manuscript accepted: 06 October 2020; Manuscript revised: 01 October 2020; Manuscript received: 27 December 2019. Data collection and continued maintenance of the US‐MtB eddy covariance flux site was supported by NSF Earth Sciences awards EAR 1417101, EAR 1331408, and EAR 1331906. We also acknowledge support provided by a contract from the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP; project number RC18‐1322). This project was supported in part by the University of Arizona Graduate College University Fellow Program. The authors acknowledge Matt Roby, Xian Wang, Matt Dannenberg, Rebecca Minor, and Patrick Murphy for help with data collection and processing. We also thank our reviewers who provided very thoughtful suggestions to improve the presentation of this work, with a special thanks to John Gamon who provided extensive insight and expertise. Data Availability Statement: The data sets used in the current study are available in the Dryad data repository (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.b2rbnzs9k).

Attached Files

Published - 2019JG005624.pdf

Files

2019JG005624.pdf
Files (2.1 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:a18393c0a3f4bf234bee2320b7e1a397
2.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023