Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 20, 2020 | Accepted Version + Published
Journal Article Open

Direct Evidence of Two-component Ejecta in Supernova 2016gkg from Nebular Spectroscopy

Abstract

Spectral observations of the type-IIb supernova (SN) 2016gkg at 300–800 days are reported. The spectra show nebular characteristics, revealing emission from the progenitor star's metal-rich core and providing clues to the kinematics and physical conditions of the explosion. The nebular spectra are dominated by emission lines of [O i] λλ6300, 6364 and [Ca ii] λλ7292, 7324. Other notable, albeit weaker, emission lines include Mg I] λ4571, [Fe ii] λ7155, O I λ7774, Ca II triplet, and a broad, boxy feature at the location of Hα. Unlike in other stripped-envelope SNe, the [O i] doublet is clearly resolved due to the presence of strong narrow components. The doublet shows an unprecedented emission line profile consisting of at least three components for each [O i]λ6300, 6364 line: a broad component (width ~2000 km s⁻¹), and a pair of narrow blue and red components (width ~300 km s⁻¹) mirrored against the rest velocity. The narrow component appears also in other lines, and is conspicuous in [O i]. This indicates the presence of multiple distinct kinematic components of material at low and high velocities. The low-velocity components are likely to be produced by a dense, slow-moving emitting region near the center, while the broad components are emitted over a larger volume. These observations suggest an asymmetric explosion, supporting the idea of two-component ejecta that influence the resulting late-time spectra and light curves. SN 2016gkg thus presents striking evidence for significant asymmetry in a standard-energy SN explosion. The presence of material at low velocity, which is not predicted in 1D simulations, emphasizes the importance of multidimensional explosion modeling of SNe.

Additional Information

© 2020. The American Astronomical Society. Received 2020 June 17; revised 2020 August 21; accepted 2020 August 26; published 2020 October 21. We thank the anonymous referee and Stefan Taubenberger for useful comments and discussions. Archival data used in this article were obtained via the UC Berkeley Supernova Database22 (Shivvers et al. 2019), the Open Supernova Catalog23 (Guillochon et al. 2017), and the Weizmann Interactive Supernova Data Repository24 (WISeREP, Yaron & Gal-Yam 2012). H.K. was funded by the Academy of Finland projects 324504 and 328898. K.M. acknowledges support by JSPS KAKENHI Grant (20H00174, 20H04737, 18H04585, 18H05223, 17H02864). L.G. was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 839090. F.G. acknowledges support from PIP 0102 (CONICET) and PICT-2017-2865 (ANPCyT). This work has been partially supported by the Spanish grant PGC2018-095317-B-C21 within the European Funds for Regional Development (FEDER). C.P.G. acknowledges support from EU/FP7-ERC grant No. [615929]. F.O.E. acknowledges support from the FONDECYT grant No. 11170953 and 1201223. Facilities: Gemini-S (GMOS-S) - , Subaru (FOCAS) - , VLT (MUSE). - Software: Astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2018), ESO Reflex (Freudling et al. 2013), GDL (Coulais et al. 2010), IRAF (Tody 1986, 1993), L.A.Cosmic (van Dokkum 2001), mpfit (Markwardt 2009), QFitsView (Ott 2012), ZAP (Soto et al. 2016).

Attached Files

Published - Kuncarayakti_2020_ApJ_902_139.pdf

Accepted Version - 2008.12294.pdf

Files

Kuncarayakti_2020_ApJ_902_139.pdf
Files (3.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:3a639b9b2e83388bc0a6b1177589e2df
2.9 MB Preview Download
md5:e41deb45807b0de295ba4e738dc26004
663.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023