Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 20, 2020 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Peak grain forecasts for the US High Plains amid withering waters

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture contributes 40% of total global food production. In the US High Plains, which produces more than 50 million tons per year of grain, as much as 90% of irrigation originates from groundwater resources, including the Ogallala aquifer. In parts of the High Plains, groundwater resources are being depleted so rapidly that they are considered nonrenewable, compromising food security. When groundwater becomes scarce, groundwater withdrawals peak, causing a subsequent peak in crop production. Previous descriptions of finite natural resource depletion have utilized the Hubbert curve. By coupling the dynamics of groundwater pumping, recharge, and crop production, Hubbert-like curves emerge, responding to the linked variations in groundwater pumping and grain production. On a state level, this approach predicted when groundwater withdrawal and grain production peaked and the lag between them. The lags increased with the adoption of efficient irrigation practices and higher recharge rates. Results indicate that, in Texas, withdrawals peaked in 1966, followed by a peak in grain production 9 y later. After better irrigation technologies were adopted, the lag increased to 15 y from 1997 to 2012. In Kansas, where these technologies were employed concurrently with the rise of irrigated grain production, this lag was predicted to be 24 y starting in 1994. In Nebraska, grain production is projected to continue rising through 2050 because of high recharge rates. While Texas and Nebraska had equal irrigated output in 1975, by 2050, it is projected that Nebraska will have almost 10 times the groundwater-based production of Texas.

Additional Information

© 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND). Edited by Peter H. Gleick, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CA, and approved August 31, 2020 (received for review April 30, 2020). PNAS first published October 5, 2020. This paper stems from discussions during the Ettersburg Ecohydrology Workshop in Germany (October 2018), with the corresponding manuscript preparation ensuing in subsequent months. The workshop was funded by the UNIDEL Foundation, Inc. and the University of Delaware. Accordingly, partial support for this paper derived from funding for the workshop. A.M. was supported by the US NSF (Grants NSF-AGS-1644382 and NSF-IOS-175489). E.W.B., M.B., D.E.C.-M., R.C., I.F.C., N.v.d.G., D.G., D.M.H., J.E.H., V.H., S.I., R.B.J., T.K., P.L., B.M., K.N., C.A.P., J.S.S., D.T., and M.Z. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: A.M., G.G.K., D.F.L., and B.R.S. designed research; A.M., A.J.G., and M.B. performed research; A.M., G.G.K., D.F.L., A.J.G., N.v.d.G., V.H., C.A.P., and B.R.S. analyzed data; and A.M., G.G.K., D.F.L., A.J.G., E.W.B., M.B., D.E.C.-M., R.C., I.F.C., N.v.d.G., D.G., D.M.H., J.E.H., V.H., S.I., R.B.J., T.K., P.L., B.M., K.N., C.A.P., J.S.S., D.T., M.Z., and B.R.S. wrote the paper. The authors declare no competing interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2008383117/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - 26145.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.2008383117.sapp.pdf

Files

26145.full.pdf
Files (3.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:fba8de64a22b02921319016b369c5ddd
2.2 MB Preview Download
md5:621a80830ab79b2594fc32dbb8eb162c
964.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
December 8, 2023