Sorting out compositional trends in sedimentary rocks of the Bradbury group (Aeolis Palus), Gale crater, Mars
Abstract
Sedimentary rocks are composed of detrital grains derived from source rocks, which are altered by chemical weathering, sorted during transport, and cemented during diagenesis. Fluvio‐lacustrine sedimentary rocks of the Bradbury group, observed on the floor of Gale crater by the Curiosity rover during its first 860 Martian solar days, show trends in bulk chemistry that are consistent with sorting of mineral grains during transport. The Bradbury group rocks are uniquely suited for sedimentary provenance analysis because they appear to have experienced negligible cation loss (i.e., open‐system chemical weathering) at the scale of the Alpha Particle X‐ray Spectrometer bulk chemistry analyses based on low Chemical Index of Alteration values and successful modeling of >90% of the (volatile‐free) targets as mixtures of primary igneous minerals. Significant compositional variability between targets is instead correlated to grain‐size and textural characteristics of the rocks; the coarsest‐grained targets are enriched in Al₂O₃, SiO₂, and Na₂O, whereas the finer‐grained targets are enriched in mafic components. This is consistent with geochemical and mineralogical modeling of the segregation of coarse‐grained plagioclase from finer‐grained mafic minerals (e.g., olivine and pyroxenes), which would be expected from hydrodynamic sorting of the detritus from mechanical breakdown of subalkaline plagioclase‐phyric basalts. While the presence of a distinctive K₂O‐rich stratigraphic interval shows that input from at least one distinctive alkali‐feldspar‐rich protolith contributed to basin fill, the dominant compositional trends in the Bradbury group are consistent with sorting of detrital minerals during transport from relatively homogeneous plagioclase‐phyric basalts.
Additional Information
© 2017 American Geophysical Union. Issue Online: 10 March 2017; Version of Record online: 02 February 2017; Accepted manuscript online: 05 January 2017; Manuscript accepted: 01 January 2017; Manuscript revised: 20 December 2016; Manuscript received: 10 October 2016. The authors are indebted to the MSL science, engineering, and management teams for their efforts in tactical and strategic operations and in enabling efficient operation of the rover. Without the support of these teams, the data presented here could not have been collected. The authors are also grateful to the science team for the helpful discussions and especially to N. Mangold and M. Schmidt for their helpful feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript. Insightful and constructive reviews by C. Fedo and J. Catalano further improved this manuscript. Some of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA. The work was also partially supported by the NASA Astrobiology Institute. Data presented in this paper are archived in the Planetary Data System (pds.nasa.gov).Attached Files
Published - 2016JE005195.pdf
Supplemental Material - jgre20623-sup-0001-supplementary.pdf
Supplemental Material - jgre20623-sup-0002-tables1.xlsx
Files
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 105216
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20200902-123548431
- NASA/JPL/Caltech
- Created
-
2020-09-08Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-16Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)