An Endowment Effect for Risk: Experimental Tests of Stochastic Reference Points
Abstract
Recent models of reference-dependent preferences indicate that expectations may play a prominent role in the presence of behavioral anomalies. A subset of such expectations-based models predicts an "endowment effect for risk": that risk attitudes differ when reference points change from certain to stochastic. In two purposefully simple risk preference experiments, eliminating often-discussed confounds, I demonstrate both between and within subjects such an endowment effect for risk. These results provide needed separation between expectations-based reference-dependent models, allow for evaluation of recent theoretical extensions, and may help to close a long-standing debate in decision science on inconsistency between utility elicitation methodologies.
Additional Information
© 2015 by The University of Chicago. Electronically published October 30, 2015. I am grateful for the insightful comments and suggestions of Nageeb Ali, Doug Bernheim, Vince Crawford, David Eil, David Gill, David Laibson, Ted O'Donoghue, Victoria Prowse, Matthew Rabin, and Joel Sobel. Particular thanks are owed to James Andreoni. I also would like to acknowledge the generous support of the National Science Foundation (SES grant 1024683).Attached Files
Published - 683836.pdf
Submitted - 317b26f7e931a7e373260b87771836b80c1c.pdf
Supplemental Material - sprenger.onlineapp.pdf
Files
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 104488
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20200721-140740314
- NSF
- SES-1024683
- Created
-
2020-07-22Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-16Created from EPrint's last_modified field