Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2, 2017 | Published
Journal Article Open

Screening for C. elegans male copulation-defective mutants by the mating plug phenotype

Abstract

We describe an efficient screen for male mating defective mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans. We report the isolation of 20 alleles that confer specific mating defects. In a previously reported screen (Hajdu-Cronin et al, 2017), we isolated 19 Cod (for copulation defective) strains in which morphologically wild-type males fail to mate. Failure to mate could conceivably result from defects in any step of the mating process: response, turning, vulva location, spicule insertion, and sperm transfer. By observation, we identified mutants defective in each of these steps except for vulva location. We believe that this was due to both redundancy of sensory structures mediating this step and our stringent screening conditions. To address this, we modified the Cod screen, using the strain plg-1(e2001d); him-5(e1490), in which the presence of a copulatory "plug" over the hermaphrodite vulva provides a visible marker for successful mating (Hodgkin and Doniach, 1997). We backcrossed plg-1(e2001d) four times into him-5(e1490) to make strain PS1395, the parent of our initial screen (sy4xx series). We subsequently repeated our screen after re-isolating a plg-1(e2001d); him-5(e1490) strain PS3696 that had consistent mating behavior and brood size (PS3696 is the parental background for the sy6xx series). Since we select for whether males are able to mate with their moving siblings as opposed to paralyzed hermaphrodites, we expected to isolate more subtle Cod mutants (such as incompletely penetrant vulva location defects). The screen would also allow for the identification of plug formation defective and hermaphrodite-specific mating defective strains. In one PS3696 screen, of 1400 F2 clones, 5% were non-Plg, 280 were then examined for behavior; we kept 69 as candidates; eight had strong phenotypes and normal morphology and were given allele names (sy678, sy680, sy681, sy682, sy683, sy684, sy685, and sy678). sy681 turned out to have the same molecular lesion as sy680 and was discarded. Overall, we isolated 20 Cod mutants from several screens including several pilot screens (Table 1). sy671 was isolated in this screen and found to be an allele of unc-18 (Schindelman et al., 2006).

Additional Information

© 2017 by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received: October 9, 2017; Accepted: November 1, 2017; Published: November 2, 2017. Funding: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, with whom PWS was an Investigator. Reviewed By: Douglas Portman and Ray Hong.

Attached Files

Published - microPublication.biology-10.17912-W2SS9K.pdf

Files

microPublication.biology-10.17912-W2SS9K.pdf
Files (195.1 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:1c1c9bab2e00f032c27554d5d3586f18
195.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023