Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 9, 2020 | Accepted Version
Report Open

Space Science Opportunities Augmented by Exploration Telepresence

Abstract

Since the end of the Apollo missions to the lunar surface in December 1972, humanity has exclusively conducted scientific studies on distant planetary surfaces using teleprogrammed robots. Operations and science return for all of these missions are constrained by two issues related to the great distances between terrestrial scientists and their exploration targets: high communication latencies and limited data bandwidth. Despite the proven successes of in-situ science being conducted using teleprogrammed robotic assets such as Spirit, Opportunity, and Curiosity rovers on the surface of Mars, future planetary field research may substantially overcome latency and bandwidth constraints by employing a variety of alternative strategies that could involve: 1) placing scientists/astronauts directly on planetary surfaces, as was done in the Apollo era; 2) developing fully autonomous robotic systems capable of conducting in-situ field science research; or 3) teleoperation of robotic assets by humans sufficiently proximal to the exploration targets to drastically reduce latencies and significantly increase bandwidth, thereby achieving effective human telepresence. This third strategy has been the focus of experts in telerobotics, telepresence, planetary science, and human spaceflight during two workshops held from October 3–7, 2016, and July 7–13, 2017, at the Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS). Based on findings from these workshops, this document describes the conceptual and practical foundations of low-latency telepresence (LLT), opportunities for using derivative approaches for scientific exploration of planetary surfaces, and circumstances under which employing telepresence would be especially productive for planetary science. An important finding of these workshops is the conclusion that there has been limited study of the advantages of planetary science via LLT. A major recommendation from these workshops is that space agencies such as NASA should substantially increase science return with greater investments in this promising strategy for human conduct at distant exploration sites.

Additional Information

© June 8, 2020 Keck Institute for Space Studies. Study Report prepared for the W. M. Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) Report Editors: Robert C. Anderson, Dan Adamo, Tom Jones, and Gregg Podnar Part I: October 3–7, 2016 Part II: July 7–13, 2017 Study Co-Leads: Robert C. Anderson, Joel W. Burdick, and Kip Hodges The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the W.M. Keck Institute for Space Studies. This study was carried out in part at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). Editing and Formatting: Meg Rosenburg Cover Image: Chuck Carter/Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) Header images: NASA, JPL-Caltech, ESA, JAXA, University of Arizona, DLR, UCLA, MPS, IDA, MSSS, NTNU

Attached Files

Accepted Version - Telepresence_Final_Report.pdf

Files

Telepresence_Final_Report.pdf
Files (88.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:2538ccb8526c67cca3f7717c4f0ababc
88.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023