Seismotectonics and Fault Geometries of the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence: Insight From Aftershock Moment Tensor Catalog Using 3-D Green's Functions
- Creators
-
Wang, Xin
-
Zhan, Zhongwen
Abstract
The 2019 M_w 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake occurred on 6 July, preceded by the M_w 6.4 foreshock on 4 July 2019. These two earthquakes occurred close in space and time with partially overlapping surface ruptures and aftershock patterns, raising the question of the relationship between the two events. Geological surveys and satellite observations provide important constraints on the surface traces of faulting. However, the subsurface fault geometries, which are important for understanding the regional stress field, earthquake initiation, propagation, and termination, are not well resolved. In this study, moment tensor solutions for 256 earthquakes in the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence were determined by waveform inversion using 3‐D velocity model. The obtained moment tensor solutions show rotations of the stresses after mainshock, indicating the ratio of mainshock stress drop to the background stress to be 0.5–0.9. The obtained moment tensor catalog also facilitates a better understanding of the subsurface fault geometries, including (1) splay faults and antithetic faults in the northwest aftershock zone; (2) shallow flower structures near the M_w 7.1 epicenter; and (3) subparallel faults in the southeast aftershock zone. The aftershocks' studies suggest the very complex surface ruptures near the 2019 Ridgecrest M_w 7.1 epicenter are near‐surface features that linked to a simple large throughgoing fault at >5 km depth. We also found that the southeastern‐most aftershocks, which are located less than a kilometer from the Garlock fault trace, have significant different strike directions from that of the Garlock fault, indicating the central Garlock fault remains seismically quiet.
Additional Information
© 2020 American Geophysical Union. Issue Online: 19 May 2020; Version of Record online: 19 May 2020; Accepted manuscript online: 20 April 2020; Manuscript accepted: 13 April 2020; Manuscript revised: 03 April 2020; Manuscript received: 07 February 2020. We thank the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC, doi:10.7909/C3WD3xH1) for providing public access to the SCEC Unified Community Velocity Model (https://www.scec.org/research/ucvm), Community Stress Model (https://www.scec.org/research/csm), and the seismic waveform data (https://scedc.caltech.edu). This work is supported by USGS/NEHRP Grant G19AP00030, SCEC 2019 Award 19011, and Air Force Research Grant 18C0058. We thank for Zachary Ross for providing the earthquake seismicity catalog. We thank Egill Hauksson, Liqing Jiao, Yu Wang, Jean‐Philippe Avouac, and Joann Stock for useful discussions. We are also grateful to editor Rachel Abercrombie and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which help improve the quality of this paper. The earthquake moment tensor catalog obtained in this study can be found in the supporting information.Attached Files
Published - 2020JB019577.pdf
Supplemental Material - jgrb54161-sup-0001-text_si-s01.docx
Supplemental Material - jgrb54161-sup-0002-data_set_si-s01.dat
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:556a81695ff1b2dda94d876087d97c8d
|
22.4 kB | Download |
md5:5f8e3348ff9d609bf169d44bda111528
|
16.1 MB | Preview Download |
md5:215e17c001cf6fcb6d4a6c45a40948f4
|
16.2 MB | Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 102665
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20200420-135541379
- USGS
- G19AP00030
- Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC)
- 19011
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
- 18C0058
- Created
-
2020-04-20Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-16Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Seismological Laboratory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)