Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 2020 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Physically Consistent Modeling of Dike-Induced Deformation and Seismicity: Application to the 2014 Bárðarbunga Dike, Iceland

Abstract

Dike intrusions are often associated with surface deformation and propagating swarms of earthquakes. These are understood to be manifestations of the same underlying physical process, although rarely modeled as such. We construct a physics‐based model of the 2014 Bárðarbunga dike, by far the best observed large dike ( >0.5 km³) to date. We constrain the background stress state by the total dike deformation, the time‐dependent dike pressure from continuous GPS and the extent of the seismic swarm, and the spatial dependence of frictional properties via the space‐time evolution of seismicity. We find that the geodetic and earthquake data can be reconciled with a self‐consistent set of parameters. The complex spatial and temporal evolution of the Bárðarbunga seismicity can be explained by dike‐induced elastic stress changes on preexisting faults, constrained by observed focal mechanisms. In particular, the model captures the segmentation of seismicity, where only the newest dike segment is seismically active. Our results indicate that many features of the seismicity result from the interplay between time‐dependent magma pressure within the dike and stress memory effects. The spatial variability in seismicity requires heterogeneity in frictional properties and/or local initial stresses. Modeling suggests that the dike pressure drops during rapid advances and increases during pauses, which primarily causes the segmentation of the seismicity. Joint analysis of multiple data types could potentially lead to improved, physics‐based eruption forecasts.

Additional Information

© 2020 American Geophysical Union. Received 1 JUN 2019; Accepted 22 JAN 2020; Accepted article online 26 JAN 2020. We thank Tim Greenfield, Bob White, and Thorbjörg Águstsdóttir for providing access to earthquake locations and magnitude estimates prior to publication. We also thank Sigrún Hreinsdóttir for providing the 8 hr GPS time series and Andy Hooper for the processed and downsampled interferograms. We thank Jean‐Luc Got and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive remarks. All data used in this study can be found under following references (Ágústsdóttir et al., 2019; Greenfield et al., 2018; Sigmundsson et al., 2015). This research was supported by NASA under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program (Grant NNX16AO40H) and NASA ROSES ESI (Grant NNX16AN08G).

Attached Files

Published - 2019JB018141.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrb53998-sup-0001-2019jb018141-supporting_information_si-s01.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrb53998-sup-0002-2019jb018141-movie_si-s01.avi

Files

2019JB018141.pdf
Files (28.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:b0732a6f5bd7ce822804981c6b7f3812
4.7 MB Preview Download
md5:45699c746b84947c8becb5069cf1882b
418.5 kB Preview Download
md5:5c4c7af7fa7f8efdcd8e14fba3875222
23.5 MB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023