Published March 16, 2010 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments

An error occurred while generating the citation.

Abstract

The ability to choose rapidly among multiple targets embedded in a complex perceptual environment is key to survival. Targets may differ in their reward value as well as in their low-level perceptual properties (e.g., visual saliency). Previous studies investigated separately the impact of either value or saliency on choice; thus, it is not known how the brain combines these two variables during decision making. We addressed this question with three experiments in which human subjects attempted to maximize their monetary earnings by rapidly choosing items from a brief display. Each display contained several worthless items (distractors) as well as two targets, whose value and saliency were varied systematically. We compared the behavioral data with the predictions of three computational models assuming that (i) subjects seek the most valuable item in the display, (ii) subjects seek the most easily detectable item, and (iii) subjects behave as an ideal Bayesian observer who combines both factors to maximize the expected reward within each trial. Regardless of the type of motor response used to express the choices, we find that decisions are influenced by both value and feature-contrast in a way that is consistent with the ideal Bayesian observer, even when the targets' feature-contrast is varied unpredictably between trials. This suggests that individuals are able to harvest rewards optimally and dynamically under time pressure while seeking multiple targets embedded in perceptual clutter.

Additional Information

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences. Edited by Anne Treisman, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved January 22, 2010 (received for review October 16, 2009). PNAS first published March 1, 2010. We thank Mike Landy, the two anonymous reviewers, and the editor for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the Office of Naval Research, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health. The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Author contributions: V.N., C.K., A.R., and P.P. designed research; V.N. performed research; V.N., A.R., and P.P. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; V.N. analyzed data; and V.N., C.K., A.R., and P.P. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0911972107/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - 5232.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.200911972SI.pdf

Files

5232.full.pdf
Files (1.4 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:da6f8e8b88cb5bc0c2d7eada58ad5897
797.7 kB Preview Download
md5:c7b91d53aa85b2c85fd1bb610e7919ac
600.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
September 15, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023