Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 1, 2020 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Sulfur isotope fractionation between aqueous and carbonate-associated sulfate in abiotic calcite and aragonite

Abstract

Sulfate (SO₄²⁻) incorporated into calcium carbonate minerals enables measurements of sulfur (S) isotope ratios in carbonate rocks. This Carbonate Associated Sulfate (CAS) in marine carbonate minerals is thought to faithfully represent the S isotope composition of the seawater sulfate incorporated into the mineral, with little or no S isotope fractionation in the process. However, comparison between different calcifying species reveals both positive and negative S isotope fractionation between CAS and seawater sulfate, and a large range of S isotope ratios can be found within a single rock sample, depending on the component measured. To better understand the isotopic effects associated with sulfate incorporation into carbonate minerals, we precipitated inorganic calcite and aragonite over a range covering more than two orders of magnitude of sulfate concentration and precipitation rate. Coupled measurements of CAS concentration, S isotope composition and X-ray absorption near-edge spectra (XANES) permit characterization and explanation of the observed dependence of S isotope fractionation between CAS and aqueous sulfate (CAS-SO₄²⁻ isotope fractionation) on sulfate concentration and precipitation rate. In aragonite, the CAS-SO₄²⁻ isotope fractionation is 1.0±0.3‰ and independent of the sulfate (and CAS) concentration. In contrast, the CAS-SO₄²⁻ isotope fractionation in calcite covaries strongly with the sulfate concentration and weakly with the precipitation rate, between values of 1.3±0.1 and 3.1±0.6‰. We suggest that the correlation between aqueous sulfate concentration and CAS-SO₄²⁻– isotope fractionation in calcite reflects a dependence of the equilibrium S isotope fractionation on the concentration of CAS, through the effect of the sulfate impurity on the carbonate mineral's energetic state.

Additional Information

© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Received 25 July 2019, Accepted 16 March 2020, Available online 24 March 2020. We thank Ziv Sade and Nir Galili for discussions. I.H. acknowledges support from a European Research Council Starting Grant (No. 337183). Part of this work was supported by the Tellus program from CNRS/INSU. Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0016703720301939-mmc1.docx

Files

Files (54.3 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:d273191a48fe9d944dace841399b8eff
54.3 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023