Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published December 2019 | Published
Journal Article Open

The effect of remote sensing resolution limits on aeolian sandstone measurements and the reconstruction of ancient dune fields on Mars: Numerical experiment using the Page Sandstone, Earth

Abstract

The distribution of cross‐set thicknesses is important data for reconstructing ancient aeolian dune fields from the strata they accumulated, but most aeolian strata on Mars must be observed from satellite. We hypothesize that remote sensing resolution limits will affect cross‐set thickness measurements and the dune‐field reconstructions that follow. Here we test this hypothesis using a numerical experiment mimicking the effects of satellite image resolution limits performed on a distribution of aeolian cross‐set thicknesses measured in the field from the Jurassic Page Sandstone, Arizona, USA. Page set thicknesses are exponentially distributed, representing the accumulations of dry dune fields (no water table interactions with the dunes) in a state of net‐sediment bypass. When observed from satellite, set‐thickness measurements increase as adjacent sets become indistinguishable, based on the map‐view distance between their upper and lower bounding surfaces. This is termed the exposure distance of a cross set and is a function of (1) the set thickness, (2) the dip of the outcrop surface, and (3) the number of satellite image pixels required to detect a set (detection limit). By running experiments using outcrop dips from 1° to 60° and detection limits from 0.75 to 2.50 m (3 to 10 High‐Resolution Imaging Science Experiment pixels), we find that gently sloping surfaces (< 13°) at all detection limits are associated with the least blending of adjacent sets, conserving the net‐bypass interpretation made from the true set thicknesses. Although these results are specific to the Page, they can be used as a guide for future Mars work.

Additional Information

© 2019 American Geophysical Union. Received 10 SEP 2019; Accepted 14 NOV 2019; Accepted article online 22 NOV 2019; Published online 3 DEC 2019. We would like to thank Editor A. Deanne Rogers and reviewers Kenzie Day and Steve Banham for their constructive comments on this manuscript. An early version of this work benefited from a discussion with Katie Stack Morgan. B. T. C. acknowledges support from the RioMar industry consortium and a University of Texas Graduate School fellowship. Data are available at Caltech's Research Data Repository (https://doi.org/10.22002/d1.1304).

Attached Files

Published - Cardenas_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Planets.pdf

Files

Cardenas_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Planets.pdf
Files (3.4 MB)

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023