Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 2019 | Submitted + Published
Journal Article Open

How low does it go? Too few Galactic satellites with standard reionization quenching

Abstract

A standard prediction of galaxy formation theory is that the ionizing background suppresses galaxy formation in haloes with peak circular velocities smaller than V_(peak) ≃ 20kms^(−1), rendering the majority of haloes below this scale completely dark. We use a suite of cosmological zoom simulations of Milky Way-like haloes that include central Milky Way disc galaxy potentials to investigate the relationship between subhaloes and ultrafaint galaxies. We find that there are far too few subhaloes within 50 kpc of the Milky Way that had V_(peak) ≳ 20kms^(−1) to account for the number of ultrafaint galaxies already known within that volume today. In order to match the observed count, we must populate subhaloes down to V_(peak) ≃ 6kms^(−1) with ultrafaint dwarfs. The required haloes have peak virial temperatures as low as 1500 K, well below the atomic hydrogen cooling limit of 10^4 K. Allowing for the possibility that the Large Magellanic Cloud contributes several of the satellites within 50 kpc could potentially raise this threshold to 10kms^(−1) (4000 K), still below the atomic cooling limit and far below the nominal reionization threshold.

Additional Information

© 2019 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model). Accepted 2019 July 17. Received 2019 July 16; in original form 2018 August 10. Published: 26 July 2019. The authors would like to thank Josh Simon for providing the dispersion velocities of dwarf satellites used in this work, and Alyson Brooks, Alex Drlica-Wagner, and Denis Erkal for useful discussions. We also thank the anonymous referee for their helpful comments on the manuscript. ASG, TK, CQ, and JSB were supported by NSF AST-1518291, HST-AR-14282, and HST-AR-13888. MBK acknowledges support from NSF grant AST-1517226 and CAREER grant AST-1752913 and from NASA grants NNX17AG29G and HST-AR-13888, HST-AR-13896, HST-AR-14282, HST-AR-14554, HST-AR-15006, HST-GO-12914, and HST-GO-14191 from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for SGK was provided by NASA through the Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship grant number PF5-160136 awarded by the Chandra X-ray Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for NASA under contract NAS8-03060. This work used computational resources of the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC; http://www.tacc.utexas.edu), the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division and the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS), and the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by National Science Foundation grant number OCI-1053575.

Attached Files

Published - stz1992.pdf

Submitted - 1808.03654.pdf

Files

1808.03654.pdf
Files (3.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:89e23fc5f183c5f50ec1f8e242463547
933.4 kB Preview Download
md5:46d744881b103623a1395272474d3334
2.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023