Association mapping from sequencing reads using k-mers
Abstract
Genome wide association studies (GWAS) rely on microarrays, or more recently mapping of sequencing reads, to genotype individuals. The reliance on prior sequencing of a reference genome limits the scope of association studies, and also precludes mapping associations outside of the reference. We present an alignment free method for association studies of categorical phenotypes based on counting k-mers in whole-genome sequencing reads, testing for associations directly between k-mers and the trait of interest, and local assembly of the statistically significant k-mers to identify sequence differences. An analysis of the 1000 genomes data show that sequences identified by our method largely agree with results obtained using the standard approach. However, unlike standard GWAS, our method identifies associations with structural variations and sites not present in the reference genome. We also demonstrate that population stratification can be inferred from k-mers. Finally, application to an E.coli dataset on ampicillin resistance validates the approach.
Additional Information
© 2018 Rahman et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. Received: 18 October 2017; Accepted: 08 June 2018; Published: 13 June 2018. We thank Faraz Tavakoli, Harold Pimentel, Brielin Brown and Nicolas Bray for helpful conversations in the development of the method for association mapping from sequencing reads using k-mers. AR, IH, MBE and LP were funded in part by NIH R21 HG006583. AR was funded in part by Fulbright Science and Technology Fellowship 15093630. The authors declare that no competing interests exist. Author contributions: Atif Rahman, Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing; Ingi leif Hallgrímsdóttir, Validation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing; Michael Eisen, Conceptu alization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—review and editing; Lior Pachter, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Vali dation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—review and editing. Data availability: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 5.Attached Files
Published - elife-32920.pdf
Submitted - 141267.full.pdf
Supplemental Material - elife-32920-transrepform-v2.pdf
Files
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC6044908
- Eprint ID
- 95211
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20190503-134759852
- NIH
- R21 HG006583
- Fulbright Foundation
- 15093630
- Created
-
2019-05-03Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2023-09-07Created from EPrint's last_modified field