Published April 6, 2010 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo

An error occurred while generating the citation.

Abstract

A crucial question in mammalian development is how cells of the early embryo differentiate into distinct cell types. The first decision is taken when cells undertake waves of asymmetric division that generate one daughter on the inside and one on the outside of the embryo. After this division, some cells on the inside remain pluripotent and give rise to the epiblast, and hence the future body, whereas others develop into the primitive endoderm, an extraembryonic tissue. How the fate of these inside cells is decided is unknown: Is the process random, or is it related to their developmental origins? To address this question, we traced all cells by live-cell imaging in intact, unmanipulated embryos until the epiblast and primitive endoderm became distinct. This analysis revealed that inner cell mass (ICM) cells have unrestricted developmental potential. However, cells internalized by the first wave of asymmetric divisions are biased toward forming pluripotent epiblast, whereas cells internalized in the next two waves of divisions are strongly biased toward forming primitive endoderm. Moreover, we show that cells internalized by the second wave up-regulate expression of Gata6 and Sox17, and changing the expression of these genes determines whether the cells become primitive endoderm. Finally, with our ability to determine the origin of cells, we find that inside cells that are mispositioned when they are born can sort into the correct layer. In conclusion, we propose a model in which the timing of cell internalization, cell position, and cell sorting combine to determine distinct lineages of the preimplantation mouse embryo.

Additional Information

© 2010 National Academy of Sciences. Edited by John B. Gurdon, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and approved February 25, 2010 (received for review December 28, 2009) We are grateful to Kat Hadjantonakis and Bill Richardson for sharing the transgenic lines, to Marko Hyvönen, Jonathon Pines, and to members of the Zernicka-Goetz laboratory for discussions. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. This article contains supplementary information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0915063107/DCSupplemental. Note Added in Proof. While this paper was under review, complementary findings describing the role of Sox17 in directing cells towards the PE lineage have been reported (27).

Attached Files

Published - 6364.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.200915063SI.pdf

Supplemental Material - sm01.mov

Supplemental Material - sm02.mov

Supplemental Material - sm03.mov

Supplemental Material - sm04.mov

Supplemental Material - sm05.mov

Supplemental Material - sm06.mov

Supplemental Material - sm07.mov

Files

6364.full.pdf
Files (10.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:211b787f3afc26094c651bb7bcba58f1
1.3 MB Download
md5:eb6716bc82ea79563b810084c8047ace
1.2 MB Preview Download
md5:aa3cff4d558d4d8a4669fadd12107bae
180.9 kB Download
md5:6eb46dbf443d63d72450d164d94d9271
128.1 kB Download
md5:56f639c365ab2e1dd39b5ec7c02fe17b
1.3 MB Download
md5:46e9df75055452866bc4d625aaabf3f1
3.2 MB Preview Download
md5:c4039d7dd57853b3ae68640c1e668aab
2.4 MB Download
md5:50acc778c3c96731c0b1976937786147
127.5 kB Download
md5:2dbd4cb50d49ac30a169ca99e016ec0b
250.2 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023