Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 2003 | public
Journal Article

Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Nonliteral language and affective prosody

Abstract

While some individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum can perform normally on standardized intelligence tests, clinical observations suggest that they nevertheless have deficits in the domains of fluid and social intelligence. Particularly important for social competence is adequate understanding and use of paralinguistic information. This study examined the impact of callosal absence on the processing of pragmatic and paralinguistic information. Young adult males with agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) were evaluated in the areas of nonliteral language comprehension, proverb recognition and interpretation, and perception of affective prosody. Ten ACC individuals with normal Wechsler IQ were compared to 14 sex, age, and IQ matched normal controls. The Formulaic and Novel Language Comprehension Test (FANL-C), Gorham Proverbs Test, and LA Prosody Test were administered. ACC subjects exhibited significant impairment on the nonliteral items of the FANL-C, but no significant difference from controls in comprehension of literal items. ACC subjects also exhibited significant deficits in both self-generated interpretation and recognition of proverb meaning, and in recognition of affective prosody. These results demonstrate that normally intelligent individuals with ACC are impaired in the understanding of nonliteral language and emotional-prosodic cues that are important in social communication. In all three tests, the performance of individuals with ACC was similar to patients with right hemisphere brain damage. Thus, persons with ACC appear to lack interhemispheric integration of critical aspects of language processed by the right hemisphere.

Additional Information

© 2003 Published by Elsevier Inc. Accepted 21 January 2003, Available online 22 April 2003.v Acknowledgements: This research was supported by NICHD Grant HD33118. Parts of this research formed the Ph.D. dissertation of Lynn K. Paul at the Graduate School of Psychology, Fuller Theological Seminary. The authors wish to thank Gail Rallon for help in analysis of proverb interpretations; Connie Dunn, Ph.D., for her assistance with data collection; Daniel Kempler and John J. Sidtis for comments on an earlier draft; and Kathryn Schilmoeller, Ph.D., and the ACC Network for help in identifying subjects.

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023