Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 2018 | Supplemental Material + Submitted + Published
Journal Article Open

Response of Marine‐Terminating Glaciers to Forcing: Time Scales, Sensitivities, Instabilities, and Stochastic Dynamics

Abstract

Recent observations indicate that many marine‐terminating glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica are currently retreating and thinning, potentially due to long‐term trends in climate forcing. In this study, we describe a simple two‐stage model that accurately emulates the response to external forcing of marine‐terminating glaciers simulated in a spatially extended model. The simplicity of the model permits derivation of analytical expressions describing the marine‐terminating glacier response to forcing. We find that there are two time scales that characterize the stable glacier response to external forcing, a fast time scale of decades to centuries, and a slow time scale of millennia. These two time scales become unstable at different thresholds of bed slope, indicating that there are distinct slow and fast forms of the marine ice sheet instability. We derive simple expressions for the approximate magnitude and transient evolution of the stable glacier response to external forcing, which depend on the equilibrium glacier state and the strength of nonlinearity in forcing processes. The slow response rate of marine‐terminating glaciers indicates that current changes at some glaciers are set to continue and accelerate in coming centuries in response to past climate forcing and that the current extent of change at these glaciers is likely a small fraction of the future committed change caused by past climate forcing. Finally, we find that changing the amplitude of natural fluctuations in some nonlinear forcing processes, such as ice shelf calving, changes the equilibrium glacier state.

Additional Information

© 2018 American Geophysical Union. Received 9 APR 2018; Accepted 25 JUL 2018; Accepted article online 2 AUG 2018; Published online 19 SEP 2018. Source code and documentation of the two‐stage and flowline models used in this study are freely available as public repositories on GitHub: https://github.com/aarobel/. Thanks to Olga Sergienko, Martin Truffer, Jeremy Bassis, and Elisa Mantelli for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was initially conceived through a series of conversations at the 2014 Advanced Climate Dynamics Course, which is coordinated by the Norwegian Research School in Climate Dynamics (ResClim). Thanks to Nicholas Beaird, Bradley Markle, and Andreas Vieli for taking part in those initial conversations. The authors also thank Christian Schoof, Victor Tsai, Georgy Manucharyan, John Christian, Denis Felikson, and Ian Joughin for subsequent conversations and suggestions. A. A. R. was supported by the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship during part of this project. G. H. R. acknowledges support from NSF PLR‐1643299. M. H. was supported by the Princeton AOS Postdoctoral and Visiting Scientist Program.

Attached Files

Published - Robel_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research_3A_Earth_Surface.pdf

Submitted - RobelRoeHaseloff_NoisyStreams_final_v12.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrf20901-sup-0001-supplementary.pdf

Files

RobelRoeHaseloff_NoisyStreams_final_v12.pdf
Files (5.1 MB)

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023