Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 21, 2018 | Submitted + Published
Journal Article Open

The clustering of H β + [O III] and [O II] emitters since z ∼ 5: dependencies with line luminosity and stellar mass

Abstract

We investigate the clustering properties of ∼7000 H β + [O III] and [O II] narrowband-selected emitters at z ∼ 0.8–4.7 from the High-z Emission Line Survey. We find clustering lengths, r_0, of 1.5–4.0 h^(−1) Mpc and minimum dark matter halo masses of 10^(10.7–12.1) M⊙ for our z = 0.8–3.2 H β + [O III] emitters and r_0 ∼ 2.0–8.3 h^(−1) Mpc and halo masses of 10^(11.5–12.6) M⊙ for our z = 1.5–4.7 [O II] emitters. We find r_0 to strongly increase both with increasing line luminosity and redshift. By taking into account the evolution of the characteristic line luminosity, L⋆(z), and using our model predictions of halo mass given r_0, we find a strong, redshift-independent increasing trend between L/L⋆(z) and minimum halo mass. The faintest H β + [O III] emitters are found to reside in 10^(9.5) M⊙ haloes and the brightest emitters in 10^(13.0) M⊙ haloes. For [O II] emitters, the faintest emitters are found in 10^(10.5) M⊙ haloes and the brightest emitters in 10^(12.6) M⊙ haloes. A redshift-independent stellar mass dependency is also observed where the halo mass increases from 10^(11) to 10^(12.5) M⊙ for stellar masses of 10^(8.5) to 10^(11.5) M⊙, respectively. We investigate the interdependencies of these trends by repeating our analysis in a L_(line)−M_(star) grid space for our most populated samples (H β + [O III] z = 0.84 and [O II] z = 1.47) and find that the line luminosity dependency is stronger than the stellar mass dependency on halo mass. For L > L⋆ emitters at all epochs, we find a relatively flat trend with halo masses of 10^(12.5–13) M⊙, which may be due to quenching mechanisms in massive haloes that is consistent with a transitional halo mass predicted by models.

Additional Information

© 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices). Accepted 2018 March 31. Received 2017 May 2; in original form 2018 February 26. Published: 14 April 2018. We thank the anonymous referee for their useful comments and suggestions that improved this study. AAK thanks Anahita Alavi and Irene Shivaei for useful discussion in the making of this paper. AAK acknowledges that this work was supported by NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program – Grant NNX16AO92H. DS acknowledges financial support from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) through a Veni fellowship and from Lancaster University through an Early Career Internal Grant A100679. PNB is grateful for support from STFC via grant STM001229/1. IRS acknowledges support from STFC (ST/L00075X/1), the ERC Advanced Grant DUSTYGAL (321334), and a Royal Society/Wolfson Merit award. JM acknowledges the support of a Huygens PhD fellowship from Leiden University. BD acknowledges financial support from NASA through the Astrophysics Data Analysis Program (ADAP), grant number NNX12AE20G.

Attached Files

Published - sty925.pdf

Submitted - 1705.01101.pdf

Files

sty925.pdf
Files (6.1 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:e128c28e6dbc63bb8197a6f5ee252ccc
4.4 MB Preview Download
md5:0ddb998c84cbfb05fc7aac413251a056
1.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023