Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 2018 | Accepted Version
Journal Article Open

The cAMP-induced G protein subunits dissociation monitored in live Dictyostelium cells by BRET reveals two activation rates, a positive effect of caffeine and potential role of microtubules

Abstract

To study the dynamics and mechanisms controlling activation of the heterotrimeric G protein Gα2βγ in Dictyostelium in response to stimulation by the chemoattractant cyclic AMP (cAMP), we monitored the G protein subunit interaction in live cells using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). We found that cAMP induces the cAR1-mediated dissociation of the G protein subunits to a similar extent in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells, suggesting that only a small number of cAR1 (as expressed in undifferentiated cells) is necessary to induce the full activation of Gα2βγ. In addition, we found that treating cells with caffeine increases the potency of cAMP-induced Gα2βγ activation; and that disrupting the microtubule network but not F-actin inhibits the cAMP-induced dissociation of Gα2βγ. Thus, microtubules are necessary for efficient cAR1-mediated activation of the heterotrimeric G protein. Finally, kinetics analyses of Gα2βγ subunit dissociation induced by different cAMP concentrations indicate that there are two distinct rates at which the heterotrimeric G protein subunits dissociate when cells are stimulated with cAMP concentrations above 500 nM versus only one rate at lower cAMP concentrations. Quantitative modeling suggests that the kinetics profile of Gα2βγ subunit dissociation results from the presence of both uncoupled and G protein pre-coupled cAR1 that have differential affinities for cAMP and, consequently, induce G protein subunit dissociation through different rates. We suggest that these different signaling kinetic profiles may play an important role in initial chemoattractant gradient sensing.

Additional Information

© 2018 Elsevier Inc. Received 5 February 2018, Revised 17 April 2018, Accepted 22 April 2018, Available online 24 April 2018. This work was supported by a Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society (grant number RSG-15–024-01-CSM) to PGC. MS was also supported by NIH T32 grant GM008804, and WJR and HY also acknowledge support from NIH grant P01 GM078586. We are grateful to Chris Janetopoulos (University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA), Alan Kimmel (NIH, Bethesda, MD), Rick Firtel (University of California−San Diego, La Jolla, CA), and Michel Bouvier (Universite de Montréal, Montréal, Canada) for providing material. We also want to thank the Dicty Stock Center for facilitating sharing of materials and the material depositors Peter Devreotes (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD), Douglas Robinson (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD) and Douwe Veltman. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the content of this article.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - nihms-1017807.pdf

Files

nihms-1017807.pdf
Files (1.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:e9a69922edf6fec3f8f8c03bf646d614
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023