Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 2, 2018 | Supplemental Material + Submitted + Published
Journal Article Open

Behavior of homing endonuclease gene drives targeting genes required for viability or female fertility with multiplexed guide RNAs

Abstract

A gene drive method of particular interest for population suppression utilizes homing endonuclease genes (HEGs), wherein a site-specific, nuclease-encoding cassette is copied, in the germline, into a target gene whose loss of function results in loss of viability or fertility in homozygous, but not heterozygous, progeny. Earlier work in Drosophila and mosquitoes utilized HEGs consisting of Cas9 and a single guide RNA (gRNA) that together target a specific gene for cleavage. Homing was observed, but resistant alleles immune to cleavage, while retaining wild-type gene function, were also created through nonhomologous end joining. Such alleles prevent drive and population suppression. Targeting a gene for cleavage at multiple positions has been suggested as a strategy to prevent the appearance of resistant alleles. To test this hypothesis, we generated two suppression HEGs in Drosophila melanogaster targeting genes required for embryonic viability or fertility, using a HEG consisting of CRISPR/Cas9 and gRNAs designed to cleave each gene at four positions. Rates of target locus cleavage were very high, and multiplexing of gRNAs prevented resistant allele formation. However, germline homing rates were modest, and the HEG cassette was unstable during homing events, resulting in frequent partial copying of HEGs that lacked gRNAs, a dominant marker gene, or Cas9. Finally, in drive experiments, the HEGs failed to spread due to the high fitness load induced in offspring as a result of maternal carryover of Cas9/gRNA complex activity. Alternative design principles are proposed that may mitigate these problems in future gene drive engineering.

Additional Information

© 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND). Edited by Dana Carroll, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved August 17, 2018 (received for review March 28, 2018). PNAS published ahead of print September 17, 2018. We thank Marlene Biller for technical assistance and three anonymous reviewers who helped improve and clarify this manuscript. This work was supported by Grant 18-CCB5400-05 from the California Cherry Board (to B.A.H. and G.O.) and by Research Fellowship 428/1-1 from the German Research Foundation (to G.O.). T.I. was supported by NIH Training Grant 5T32GM007616-39. Author contributions: G.O. and B.A.H. designed research; G.O. performed research; G.O., T.I., and B.A.H. analyzed data; and G.O., T.I., and B.A.H. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1805278115/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - E9343.full.pdf

Submitted - 289546.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1805278115.sapp.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1805278115.sd01.xlsx

Supplemental Material - pnas.1805278115.sd02.xlsx

Supplemental Material - pnas.1805278115.sd03.xlsx

Supplemental Material - pnas.1805278115.sd04.txt

Files

289546.full.pdf
Files (5.4 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:482795a38772b02e8fcb9f1262aa8724
12.6 kB Download
md5:69ed91ee55719a7ae9ef9939f16de7b0
2.5 MB Preview Download
md5:e45badfd6d601501c6de071193d24406
937.5 kB Preview Download
md5:d068d53144c68c03174c4ed12f4dbb16
20.3 kB Download
md5:c2a6f08cca237ce6a5368cf570a5af96
7.2 kB Download
md5:cd913a1daecda7b4894af82459152d2a
16.2 kB Preview Download
md5:9b33529de113c655bb4c7f367a779128
1.9 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023