Chloroplast SRP43 acts as a chaperone for glutamyl-tRNA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis
Abstract
Assembly of light-harvesting complexes requires synchronization of chlorophyll (Chl) biosynthesis with biogenesis of light-harvesting Chl a/b-binding proteins (LHCPs). The chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) pathway is responsible for transport of nucleus-encoded LHCPs in the stroma of the plastid and their integration into the thylakoid membranes. Correct folding and assembly of LHCPs require the incorporation of Chls, whose biosynthesis must therefore be precisely coordinated with membrane insertion of LHCPs. How the spatiotemporal coordination between the cpSRP machinery and Chl biosynthesis is achieved is poorly understood. In this work, we demonstrate a direct interaction between cpSRP43, the chaperone that mediates LHCP targeting and insertion, and glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR), a rate-limiting enzyme in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. Concurrent deficiency for cpSRP43 and the GluTR-binding protein (GBP) additively reduces GluTR levels, indicating that cpSRP43 and GBP act nonredundantly to stabilize GluTR. The substrate-binding domain of cpSRP43 binds to the N-terminal region of GluTR, which harbors aggregation-prone motifs, and the chaperone activity of cpSRP43 efficiently prevents aggregation of these regions. Our work thus reveals a function of cpSRP43 in Chl biosynthesis and suggests a striking mechanism for posttranslational coordination of LHCP insertion with Chl biosynthesis.
Additional Information
© 2018 National Academy of Sciences. Published under the PNAS license. Edited by Donald R. Ort, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved March 7, 2018 (received for review November 13, 2017) We thank Prof. Danja Schünemann (Ruhr University Bochum) for the help with Arabidopsis cpsrp mutants, GST-cpSRP43 expression vector, and antibodies against cpSRP components. We thank Dr. B. Hedtke and J. Apitz (B.G. laboratory) for help with research materials. This work was supported by a fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (to P.W.) and by grants from the Betty and Gordon Moore Foundation (Grant 94-3397785) and NIH (Grant R01 GM114390) (both to S.-o.S.) and a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR2092, Grant GR 936/18-1 to B.G.). Author contributions: P.W., F.-C.L., D.W., A.S., S.-o.S., and B.G. designed research; P.W., F.-C.L., D.W., and A.S. performed research; P.W., F.-C.L., D.W., A.S., S.-o.S., and B.G. analyzed data; and P.W., S.-o.S., and B.G. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1719645115/-/DCSupplemental.Attached Files
Published - E3588.full.pdf
Supplemental Material - pnas.1719645115.sapp.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:c2dd9b58300d746a2f4c0d289345f7c7
|
2.1 MB | Preview Download |
md5:844ba49c9d2dd601c0682375d95f1d34
|
3.8 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC5899456
- Eprint ID
- 85436
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20180326-161145347
- Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- 94-3397785
- NIH
- R01 GM114390
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
- GR 936/18-1
- Created
-
2018-03-26Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2022-03-11Created from EPrint's last_modified field